SpeechCraft Draft Guidelines

3 views
Skip to first unread message

R Ravi Kumar

unread,
Jun 29, 2016, 8:58:36 AM6/29/16
to tmc...@googlegroups.com
Dear Team,

As promised, PFA the Draft Guidelines for Speechcraft.

Please read this thoroughly and discuss this in detail during your Excom Meet. Make edits if needed and circulate it to members. If need be, getting a Voting done and finalise a transparent process.

Regards,Ravi.
sc-agenda.pdf
Speechcraft.pdf

Ravindra Sonavane

unread,
Dec 30, 2016, 2:36:08 AM12/30/16
to tmc...@googlegroups.com
Dear Team,

In continuation with the below guidelines prepared by TMCP’s ex-president R.Ravikumar, we had discussed on the following Revenue model for the speechcraft’s conducted through our cub TMCP.

Club Revenue : 5% of the total amount charged to the trainee entity.

Co-ordinator’s incentive : Co-ordinator is a person / group of person involved in initiating / negotiating / finalising and co-ordinating the Speechcraft  program structure with the trainee entity. Since, this involves effort in terms of time and skill. The Co-ordinator (s) will be incentivised 10% of the total amount charged.

Other Costs : As discussed in the pdf attached there are various costs involved in the end to end conduct of the Speechcraft program. The various costs along with the trainers (including co-ordinator if the person is also delivering the training) incentive will be part of this costs. This is at maximum 85% of the total costs charged.

All other details about Speechcraft is extensively mentioned in the pdf’s attached along with this mail.

Please approve the structure so that this can be communicated and passed to all the members of TMCP. 

Regards,
Ravindra

sc-agenda.pdf
Speechcraft.pdf

rravik...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 30, 2016, 3:16:21 AM12/30/16
to Ravindra Sonavane, tmc...@googlegroups.com
Guys,

Avoid any remunerative angles in a not-for-profit entity. 

If the coordinator is to be felicitated, do it in 'kind'.

The motive behind Speechcraft needs to be Social at all times and from all perspectives. 

Furthermore, before circulating to club members, get a sign off on the final version with the AD, DD and then put it across to members. 

Regards, Ravi. 

Sent from my iPhone
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TMCP_EC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tmcp_ec+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<sc-agenda.pdf>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TMCP_EC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tmcp_ec+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
<Speechcraft.pdf>




Begin forwarded message:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TMCP_EC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tmcp_ec+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TMCP_EC" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tmcp_ec+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Ravindra Sonavane

unread,
Dec 30, 2016, 6:38:04 AM12/30/16
to R Ravi Kumar, tmc...@googlegroups.com
Hi Ravi,

Thanks for the recommendation. I agree to it. The recommendations mentioned in previous mail were more from the perspective of capping the expense numbers. The incentive can be cash or in kind. However, looking at some past instances, we can look at incentives in kind OR no incentives at all. i am ok with both the option. 

I have two views in this regards;

1. If we consider to reward the co-ordinator / trainer in kind (by say giving a gift voucher) will there be a cap on the cost of the reward ? in my opinion, i would not want to keep this aspect OPEN. So, as suggested below; the maximum reward in kind should be restricted to 10% of the total amount charged to the trainee entity. This also helps in pricing a speechcraft to the trainee entity.


2. If co-ordinators / trainers incentive is not to be considered at all (even in kind), then I would recommend to remove incentive (even in kind) related  points from the pdf guidelines all together. And rather say the below (bold and underline),

COSTS 

Material from TI, 

Travel & Logistics for the members coordinating the program (reasonable expenses should be considered, would be better if the coordinating members can provide some voucher/receipt/backing for the expenses incurred), 

Venue Rental Costs, 

Printing & Stationery Costs (if any), 

Food & Beverages at the Venue (if the Club so decides). 

The Club (can Vote on this) may further decide on an Incentive Based Model for the Coordinators & Trainers (C&T)
o The incentives should strictly be non-remunerative i.e. non-monetary (for eg: Trophies, Certificates, Recognition in the form of Lapel Pins, Felicitation etc.) 
o This is over and above the credits the C&T get in their respective TI Manuals for the additional efforts the members are putting both in terms of time and engagement with non-members. 


@Members, please let us know your views on the same.

Thanks,
Ravindra  
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages