David Scott being Censored on TLDA lists. Re: [TLDA Public] Allegations of incompetence.

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Joe Baptista

unread,
Jul 27, 2009, 10:41:26 PM7/27/09
to tlda-m...@googlegroups.com, bo...@tldainc.org, mem...@tldainc.org, pub...@tldainc.org, mar...@anycast.net
How many people are been censored by the TLDA these days - the numbers grow. I know David Scott is. I think I started a trend. David Scott's email to the TLDA public and members list has not yet shown up on either list. Did anyone else get it?

Is anyone else censored from either the public or members list. If anyone has time to test please forward Davids email to the members and public lists at the - TLDA.m...@tldainc.org, pub...@tldainc.org - thank god we have this list which is of course censor free.

David - I support you in this. Hopefully the three lawyers we were referred to can help. If the board refuses to pay for one. I'll get you a lawyer in Georgia.

Incidentally David - FYI - I think Bradley has clearly stated you are an employee of the TLDA.

http://tldainc.org/pipermail/board_tldainc.org/2009-July/000262.html

I disagree with the description provided. You are not being fired in the classical way one would fire an employee. You have been subjected to public humiliation by Bradley Thornton.

Even though you are a volunteer - you hold an executive office within the organization. And they are publicly hanging you. When Gene Marsh was appointed president you remember you were asked to participate in a private board meeting. That is in fact the proper proceeding for the hiring of an employee. There are privacy issues.

The same rules apply to the firing of an employee. It's a private affair. It should never be what this travesty at the TLDA has become. Public humiliation. Brad should hang his head in shame for pulling this stunt.

Review your notes you'll find in them that Gene Marsh promised to deliver to you as director and to the members a professional organization. What is going on at the board has no remote connection with professionalism. It shows us fools are in chargeof the TLDA and the lead fool in charge is Gene Marsh.

I am certain in these economic times we can find you a lawyer pro bono specifically for the purpose of a libel and slander suit.

Gene is responsible for what has happened at the TLDA. Yes we have crooks - con artists - thieves - and one professional executive in charge.

I wonder does Gene even care.

Prediction - if Gene is poor he won't care and will ignore this. I don't know if Gene has money. A little bit of Gene Marsh history. Gene is in fact a former executive. He was mainly in the technology end (experimental) at Diebold.He helped launch the .ATM TLD at Diebold. He was a rising star.

Gene's debut ended abruptly when Diebold lawyers discovered Gene was running an internal network (ISP) using the Diebold in house collocation facilities. An audit had to be conducted to find all the machines. It was because of me that Diebold conducted the audit. Issues of network security - etc. etc.

Gene told me he had Diebolds permission to do what he was doing. But that was a lie. Diebold lawyers had no idea what was going on.Gene was fired and disgraced in the security banking bank safe industry and from that time on had a very hard time getting back on his feet. His reputation as a high flyer ended.

It's a very sad story. Incidentally the Diebold lawyers found out because some one at the EFF complained about some user on Gene network. They had technicians running around trying to find these machines Gene had hidden at their data center. In the end it's a funny story how Gene got fired.

Oh and Gene tried to get me to lie for him too.

So I think David - you should only sue Gene after we get a credit report on him. He may very well be unemployed and unemployable like Karl and Brad. I think John Palmer also has a job.

As a volunteer employee you can sue these idiots for good money. Right now you just started your own consultancy business after doing a good job at your former employer - who went bust. So the last thing you need is to be slandered and you should sue. You will win and I'm sure we can find a lawyer to do this on consignment. I'm willing to raise money to pay your filing fees.

I'm sure people here will help. I have been a big fan of yours. You have done well holding the rats at the TLDA accountable. We will help you seek justice in this.

cheers
joe baptista

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:28 AM, David Scott <tl...@ucann2.org> wrote:

All,

It has come to my attention, that there is a motion to remove me form
the position of Secretary. I have enclosed in this email, a formal response
to the allegations in the response, and the full corruption of the Board
of Directors, and those very Executives taking effect to high jack this
organization and by performing illegal actions against the very members
that this organization is to uphold.

1) As of date (July 26, 2009) I have received no Board emails at all,
thus causing me not to be an active part of the BoD, yet no bounces have
been returned to the organization.
2) Karl has openly admitted that I'm not receiving emails form the
Board, by attempting to forward / copy me personally the motion.
By which Bradly attempted to state to dismiss Karl's statement.

3) As of my Secretarial duties, I can not and could perform the
Secretarial duties as nothing of the information was ever given to me to
perform the needed actions.
4) As far as the Bank account, the track of emails will be presented to
aide in WHY I never opened it, as Karl stated to me personnelly in email
that he Assigned Bradley Thornton to temp sectretary for the sole reason
of opening a bank account.

6) The removal of a member. The By-Laws where in deed changed after a
verified compliant member was removed. The member was not removed for
reasons againist the bylaws, but his opinion and statements.
These statements are much the same line as the statements by John
Palmer, Bradley Thornton, and Hermen Zennt.

Further more, not only do I object to the removal of the Secretary based
on the grounds, that Bradley Thornton, John Palmer should be removed as
members based on the same principles that Joe Baptista was removed, but
I object to the motion, as none of my Formal Requests as a member,
Secretary, or active Board member have ever been fulfilled.

1) Where is the records of the bank account, with all interactions of
the TLDA?
2) Why has the TLDA allowed a known theif back into the BoD?
3) Why is the TLDA executives making slandering and libeling statements
against its members, and kicking members for the same actions/statments.

And Now, I'm being threaten as to method of my integrity. Let this be
known, that since Karl is the CFO of this organization, and has yet
published any records for the current Secretary or the current BoD to
review, that no member should give any money to this organization, under
the assumption that the TLDA does in deed have a bank account, then it
is not official as the records where never supplied to the BoD, and as
such should be consider in the name of Bradley Thornton and / or Karl
Peters, and with this presumption, the money donated to the organiaztion
will in deed go to one of these 2 people.

And based on these statements and grounds listed above, I motion that
every one of the BoD involved with any committee dealing with money and
donations thereof be removed and banned from the BoD. No BoD member
should have access to the money of this organization.
This organization based on theses facts, can not and never will pay it's
bills.

And as such, in my advisor's written words.....

I am responding to you email. I reserve the right to consult and be
represented in this by a lawyer. I believe the motion made by Bradley
Thornton is libelous and vexatious. I also recommend the board consult a
lawyer these are serious accusations.

I remind the board and Gene Marsh that I may have a contractual
obligation to act as your secretary and this motion may be considered a
serious breach. Gene I hold you responsible also for this libel and
slander.

I ask that the board provide me with a lawyer. If the TLDA will not
provide me with a lawyer I ask that you provide me with notice to that
effect. I will appoint a lawyer and reserve the right to hold board
members and executive officers personally responsible for payment of any
expenses associated with hiring legal council.

I will require at a minimum three weeks to review notes, emails and
telephone conversations I had with Gene Marsh, Bradley Thornton, Karl
Peters, and other members. In order to provide a proper defense to these
libelous and slanderous accusations of Mr. Thornton.

I understand John Palmer seconded the motion. I consider Mr. Palmer to
have a conflict of interest with me. He has sent me threatening emails.
I intend to provide copies of these emails as part of my defense.

References
References:
http://tldainc.org/pipermail/board_tldainc.org/2009-July/000258.html
http://tldainc.org/pipermail/board_tldainc.org/2009-July/000261.html

David Scott
Secretary Top Level Domain Association







--
Joe Baptista

www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
----------------------------------------------------------------
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative & Accountable to the Internet community @large.
----------------------------------------------------------------
 Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)
    Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084

Personal: www.joebaptista.wordpress.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages