I think a broader case is an instantiated theorem with a plain expression body, like the above. That still produces APSubstInNode, even though the theorem body is not ASSUME/PROVE.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/defbaba5-38df-4e27-826d-0c5a007b3f1dn%40googlegroups.com.