Re: [tlaplus] Uninstall TLA+

42 views
Skip to first unread message

Sergey Bronnikov

unread,
Feb 21, 2022, 10:45:22 AM2/21/22
to tla...@googlegroups.com
Hi!
 
This way works for me:
 
sergeyb@pony:~$ sudo apt remove -y tla+toolbox
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  lua-expat lua-filesystem lua-penlight
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  tla+toolbox
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 50 not upgraded.
After this operation, 326 MB disk space will be freed.
(Reading database ... 441938 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing tla+toolbox (1.8.0~20220203-0157) ...
Processing triggers for mime-support (3.64ubuntu1) ...
Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.17-2) ...
Processing triggers for gnome-menus (3.36.0-1ubuntu1) ...
Processing triggers for shared-mime-info (1.15-1) ...
Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils (0.24-1ubuntu3) ...
$


-- 
Сергей



21.02.2022, 00:48, "Jones Martins" <jone...@gmail.com>:
Hi everyone,

I am trying to uninstall TLA+ and the TLA+ Toolbox for a clean install afterwards.
I'm running Ubuntu 20.04.

Currently, I have the following packages installed listed by running sudo apt list | grep tla

tla+toolbox/now 1.8.0~20211216-0507 amd64 [installed,local]
tla-doc/focal,focal 1.3.5+dfsg1-2build1 all
tla/focal 1.3.5+dfsg1-2build1 amd64

Uninstalling them by name does not work. Can someone help?


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tlaplus" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tlaplus+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tlaplus/9ccef7c3-7f09-4012-ac12-70965ae632a1n%40googlegroups.com.

Jones Martins

unread,
Feb 21, 2022, 6:31:35 PM2/21/22
to tlaplus
Hi, Sergey

I successfully uninstalled TLA+ and deleted this thread afterwards, but your solution would've worked better in this case. 

Thanks!

Jones
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages