To those familiar with thermoelectricity in the mid to late '90s, Chen, a professor of mechanical engineering, had an interest that might have seemed odd. The technology was a niche player in the energy arena. But he'd worked in closely related areas: In his Berkeley studies, he notes, "I showed that heat does not travel well in nanostructures." At about the same time, the first intellectual seeds for a vastly expanded role for thermoelectricity were being planted. Some ideas from that era, in fact, have combined with society's energy worries to propel thermoelectricity into the limelight.
Mini-power plant
Thermoelectric devices are energy converters. When they're producing electricity, this puts them in the same broad category as power plants and solar-generating systems. When outputting heat or its opposite, meanwhile, they're like heat pumps and air conditioners, respectively. In design terms, thermoelectric devices have key pluses. For one, they're solid state: no liquid fuels, no moving parts. They're also easily scalable up or down. There have been efforts to make the technology more mainstream. "In the '40s and '50s," says Chen, "there was a lot of interest in solid-state refrigeration. The goal was to create full-sized thermoelectric refrigerators." But while thermoelectric mini-fridges are increasingly common, the dreams of those early enthusiasts came to naught.
Why? It was mainly an efficiency issue. A key reason this dam began to give way in the early '90s is that MIT physicist Mildred Dresselhaus and a colleague had an idea: Instead of simply testing a long list of different materials, why not change the materials themselves by structuring them internally such that performance improves?
The pair specifically proposed creating nanoscale substructures in the materials. What made the concept intriguing is that the ideal thermoelectric device is one that is great at conducting current and an abject failure at conducting heat.
That's a rare combination. "Nature," says Chen, "doesn't provide many examples of materials that are great electrical conductors and also good thermal insulators." But technical staff member Ted Harman at MIT's Lincoln Laboratory--building in part on Chen's earlier, unrelated work--showed that by using nanostructures, you can create materials that outdo nature: Some of Harman's materials, thanks to their unique heat-impeding qualities, are twice as efficient as their conventional cousins.
It's an astonishing advance--roughly equivalent, if on a drastically smaller scale, of turning a one-megawatt power plant into a two-megawatt one.
Of course, it's tough to turn advances in tiny experimental devices into commercial winners: Don't expect whole-house thermoelectric air-conditioning systems to start turning up at your local HVAC dealers anytime soon.
On the other hand, Chen says innovations like an exhaust-mounted energy-mining device for vehicles needn't wait until you hit Lincoln Lab realms of efficiency. "If you can reach a 10-to-15 percent conversion efficiency," he says, "that would be attractive for many applications." In fact, results he's had at that level are already drawing interest from companies.
This not only gives Chen hope that thermoelectricity's time may have truly come, it also resonates with the goals he's set for himself as a researcher. "I like to explore things that are fundamentally new and different," he says, "and then see how I can use those findings to make an impact on the real world."