Follow Me @ Patreon My Newsletter Instagram Facebook DA Merchandise Flickr 500pxThanks to Camera Canada for giving me a great deal on the a6600 and 18-135mm used in this review. They are my personal source for my gear and have been great to work with. As always, this is a completely independent review.
Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.
The Sony α6600 is Sony's flagship APS-C camera, sitting above the similar Sony α6400. Though the two share the same 24-megapixel APS-C sensor, the a6600 adds in-body image stabilization (IBIS), a bigger battery, and slightly sturdier build quality. Like other Sony cameras, it has an excellent autofocus system, and its tilting screen can flip all the way up, making this a solid APS-C option for videos and vlogs as well as photography.
The Sony a6600 is great for travel photography. It has a relatively compact body that's easy to store and travel with. It's also weather-sealed against moisture and dust. Depending on how you use it, the camera also has an incredibly long battery life, meaning it can last through long hikes or days on the go. However, its menu system can be confusing and difficult to navigate.
The Sony Alpha 6600 is great for landscape photography. It feels well-built and comfortable, and its body is weather-sealed against moisture and dust. It has great dynamic range to capture a wider range of detail in high-contrast landscape shots. Photos are also sharp and detailed even at higher ISOs for nighttime or low-light landscapes. Unfortunately, it has a convoluted menu system, and you can't use the touchscreen to navigate it.
The Sony a6600 is good for shooting sports and wildlife. Its IBIS feature is fairly effective in reducing handheld camera shake, and its 11 fps burst rate is fast enough to capture quick bursts of fast action. Its autofocus system also does a fantastic job of tracking moving subjects, and it includes animal eye detection, though it's most effective with larger animals and pets. Unfortunately, the camera's photo buffer takes a long time to empty once full, and it only has a single SD card slot rated for UHS-I cards. That said, UHS-II cards are still compatible, and the buffer empties quicker when using one, though it's still slow enough that it can interrupt your shooting at a critical moment.
The Sony a6600 delivers very good RAW photo performance. Its dynamic range is great, so it can capture high-contrast scenes with a relatively wide range of detail preservation. It also resolves fine detail well, thanks to the high resolution of its sensor. Noise handling is decent overall, though it struggles a bit more in very dark lighting conditions.
The Sony Alpha 6600 is good for vlogging. It's relatively portable, and you can flip its screen up to face you for vlogs. It delivers great overall video quality and performs impressively well in low light. Its autofocus system does a fantastic job tracking faces and keeping subjects in focus. It has in-body image stabilization, although it only does a decent job of reducing camera shake when shooting handheld. The camera also has a confusing menu system that you can't navigate with the touchscreen, which is inconvenient when you have it facing you for vlogs. There's significant rolling shutter effect in 4k, resulting in skewed vertical lines when panning from side to side.
The Sony Alpha a6600 is great for studio video. It has an exceptional battery life and no recording time limit for longer shooting sessions. You're also unlikely to experience any overheating when recording continuously. It has a headphone jack and a microphone jack as well as a Micro HDMI port. It delivers excellent 4k video quality and has a few Log profiles to take advantage of the camera's full dynamic range. Though you can get 4:2:2 subsampling over HDMI, the camera's limited to 4:2:0 internally, so you won't get as clean an image when processing your footage. It can also only record in 8-bit, even with an external recorder connected via HDMI, limiting how much latitude you have when grading your footage. Its sensor also has a slow readout speed, causing a lot of rolling shutter artifacts when panning from side to side. Its menu system can be hard to navigate, too.
The Sony Alpha 6600 isn't meant for action video. While it's relatively portable for an interchangeable lens camera, it isn't designed to mount onto a helmet or chest rig. It's weather-sealed against moisture and dust, but it isn't rated for more extreme weather conditions or for being submerged in water. Its 4k frame rates are also limited and not suited for generating slow-motion footage.
The Sony a6600 comes in one color variant: 'Black'. We purchased our unit with the Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS zoom lens, but you can also buy it without a lens or in other lens configurations, depending on the retailer. Let us know if you come across a different variant, and we'll update the review.
The Sony Alpha 6600 is Sony's most advanced APS-C mirrorless camera yet. While it stands out in autofocus performance, 4k video features, and low-light performance, it falls short in other ways, including its cumbersome menu system and laggy operation, long buffer empty time, and slow sensor readout speed.
The Sony α6400 and the Sony α6600 are both APS-C cameras, and they perform similarly overall since they use the same sensor. The biggest difference between them is the inclusion of in-body image stabilization on the α6600, which can help stabilize the image at slower shutter speeds or longer focal lengths, even without an optically stabilized lens. The α6600 also has a larger battery that gives it nearly twice the rated battery life. However, the larger battery makes it bigger and heavier than the α6400. The α6600 also has a headphone jack and a couple more customizable buttons, though the α6400 has a built-in flash.
The Sony α6700 is better overall than the Sony α6600. It has some notable improvements in design, build quality, and ergonomics. The biggest differences, however, come from its updated video features and new AI-powered processor, which give it improved autofocus subject detection and improve its overall capabilities. That said, image quality is roughly on par.
The Sony α7 III is a bit better overall than the Sony α6600, mostly because it uses a full-frame sensor while the α6600 has an APS-C sensor. As a result, the α7 III delivers better image quality and performs better at higher ISO levels in low light. Both are mirrorless cameras with highly effective autofocus systems, but the α7 III has a slightly larger EVF. It also has two SD card slots, but unlike the α6600, it isn't weather-sealed. The α6600 is also a bit lighter and more portable.
The Sony α6600 is better overall than the Sony ZV-E10. It has built-in image stabilization, a sturdier, weather-sealed body with a viewfinder, and significantly better battery life. However, it isn't as portable and lacks some of the vlogging-specific features found on the ZV-E10, like 'Background Defocus' and 'Product Showcase'.
The Sony α6600 is better overall than the Sony α6100. Both cameras use the same sensor and lens mount, but the α6600 feels better built and has weather-sealing, a higher-resolution viewfinder, in-body image stabilization, and a bigger battery for longer battery life.
The Sony α6600 is a significant upgrade over the Sony α6000. The α6600 takes what works about the α6000, like a low-profile form factor and extensive customization options, and adds a bigger battery, a more ergonomic handgrip, and in-body image stabilization. The α6600 also has a newer sensor with better dynamic range and high-ISO performance, as well as an improved autofocus system and 4k video capability. It also includes more connectivity options and weather-sealing, although it isn't as portable as the α6000.
The Sony α7C performs similarly to the Sony α6600, although it has a slight edge thanks to its backside-illuminated full-frame sensor, as opposed to the a6600's APS-C sensor. As a result, out-of-camera image quality and high-ISO performance are a bit better on the α7C. The cameras are similar in size, although the α6600 has a couple of extra custom buttons and a larger, more comfortable EVF. Both cameras are weather-sealed, feature in-body image stabilization, and use Sony's highly effective autofocus system; however, the α7C uses a newer version with more settings to fine-tune AF performance.
The Sony α6600 and the Nikon Z 50 are both APS-C mirrorless cameras, though the Sony is a little higher-end, with weather-sealing and in-body image stabilization. The Sony also has a bigger battery that lasts longer, is more portable, and has a more reliable autofocus system. That said, they both deliver impressive image quality, and the Nikon has slightly better high-ISO noise handling, making it a tad better-suited to low-light photography.
The Sony α6600 is better overall than the Canon EOS M50 Mark II. Though both are mirrorless cameras with APS-C sensors, the Sony camera has a more effective autofocus system, better image quality and RAW noise handling, in-body image stabilization, and longer battery life. However, it isn't as portable as the Canon and has a more confusing menu system.
The Sony α6600 is better than the Fujifilm X-T30 II. It has better build quality and ergonomics, as well as a significantly longer battery life, a more reliable autofocus system, and in-body image stabilization.
The Sony α6600 and the Fujifilm X-S10 are both APS-C mirrorless cameras that perform similarly overall. Both cameras have IBIS and deliver excellent out-of-camera JPEGs, although the Fujifilm offers several film simulation profiles to help you play with the look of your photos in-camera. The Fujifilm camera has better RAW noise handling performance at higher ISO settings for low-light situations. That said, the Sony camera has a more consistent and reliable autofocus system, a larger EVF, and a significantly longer battery life. It's also weather-sealed against moisture and dust.
c80f0f1006