tinymux-dev

Look at the SQL readme file in the distribution. It will talk about the sqlslave module, compiling

On Sunday, February 14, 2016 at 5:50:41 PM UTC-8, Stephen Dennis wrote: > tinymux.slack.com >

And really, even the required changes for submitting a new Debian package are done and checked in.

Comment by brazilof...@gmail.com: General Comment: Look at the restrict_home configuration option

brazilofmux commented on revision r4480 in project tinymux. Details are at http://code.google.com/p/

brazilofmux commented on revision r4470 in project tinymux. Details are at http://code.google.com/p/

Previous code review comments. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <tinymux@googlecode.

Because of recent spam, membership now requires approval. Brazil

TinyMUX on Solaris does not require libresolv.a, but it does need libnsl.a, so we use the following:

Noltar has been doing the Debian packages for TinyMUX and PennMUSH. I've posted his 2.6 work back

Intel has dropped support fro VC6. Version 10.1 of their compiler supports Visual Studio 2003, 2005

>git-clone git+ssh://m...@repo.or.cz/srv/git/tinymux.git >cd tinymux >git-checkout -b mob

Most of the tables are small: // 150 states, 99 columns, 15106 bytes // 6 states, 14 columns, 340

The git repository at http://repo.or.cz/w/tinymux.git has added the ability to accept pushes from

The MSDN articles for this have settled somewhat. It isn't that hard to gloss over the

The module work in TinyMUX is still in the early stages, but I wanted to outline where I think

On 2/16/07, Roy Anger <gre...@gmail.com> wrote: Brazil's intention is to break up --enable

We probably need to add the files used to construct the SGP minimal database to the source repository

On 1/24/07, Robby Griffin <ali...@gmail.com> wrote: On Jan 22, 2007, at 14:53, Stephen Dennis

Scheme for TinyMUX 2.4 and prior as well as other related codebases: ABCDE ... ^ ^ | | char *buff---/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_notation Hungarian naming has fallen out of favor to a large

I'd like to release 2.7.0.2 around the 20th which is in about a week from now. So, the decision

Originally, I though that January 6th would be too soon for 2.7 Apha 1 because it would not contain

svn tinymux.googlecode.com/svn/branches/TinyMUX-2.6 The existing promotion tree with dev_alierak,

On Nov 24, 2006, at 15:16, brazi...@gmail.com wrote: > Also ran the following for several hours

We are almost to a point where certain kinds of changes to 2.6 should not be made. We have a little

TinyMUX 2.4.3.32 contains what I think are the final bits for Etch. I saw 2.4.3.31 move from unstable

All changes have been merged up to dev and down to dev_brazil, dev_ronan, and dev_alierak. Unless