I've tried to recreate this on the nspire by using a combination of window settings, line styles (discrete, dotted, etc.) and parametric mode. No luck, but maybe somebody else has something.
On the other hand, even though a hole does not appear in the graph of (x^2-4)/(x+2), when you go into Graph Trace on the nspire and manually enter x=2, you get (2, undef), and the little crosshairs tracing the curve disappear, which is a nice feature.
By the way in experimenting I ran into something strange:
Enter Robert's function parametrically as x1(t) = t, y1(t) = (t^2-4)/(t-2) and go into Graph Trace. Set the trace step to 0.1 and start tracing at, say, t=1. As you trace back and forth across the trouble spot t=2, the trace step changes from the 0.1 you specified. I have found this annoying in other contexts as well (such as polar).
John Losse
> --
> To post to this group, send email to tins...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe send email to tinspire+u...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com.au/group/tinspire?hl=en-GB?hl=en-GB
> The tns documents shared by group members are archived at
> http://lafacroft.com/archive/nspire.php

In experimenting with it, it did seem that, if you change the function to one where the hole or asymptotes are at, say, 1/2 and 2/3, some adjustments would have to be made to the slider setup to get the hollow point and asymptote to appear. I couldn't see how to make these adjustments, and would be interested in how Marc designed the document to achieve what he did, which is pretty slick.
So far, it seems that, as with the 83/84, it is possible to show the hole in the graph and the vertical asymptote on the nspire only if the "atmospherics" are just right.
John Losse
For example, say I wanted to increment by 0.5...
- in the hollow() program, change the x1 definition to x1:=round(2*x1,0)/2
- in the lower screen on page 1.1, change the x-scale to 0.5
If I were to do this document again, I'd probably approach it a bit
differently, and I'd introduce an x-scale slider to control how the
value of x increments, or I'd just control x using a built-in slider and
then the increment could be easily adjusted.
Marc Garneau