About the keyboard: I think the new keyboard is more steps forward
than back (and I'm planning on getting the new version just for that
reason alone). Even though some keys were eliminated or merged into
one key (like the SIN/COS/TAN keys), I think it's done in a very
thoughtful and efficient way. For example, pressing TRIG/ENTER gives
SINe, TRIG/TRIG/ENTER gives COSine, etc. Not too much of a hassle,
considering the most frequent use is for SIN and COS.
But I still don't get it why they did not make the keyboard QWERTY-
style (both new and old)? (Is that just so the X, Y, and Z keys end
up next to each other, or was there another, more serious, reason?)
For anyone used to a computer keyboard, any different arrangement only
slows things down. Even students who may not have learned QWERTY yet
(I doubt there are any for the ages this calc targets), sooner or
later, they will be forced to learn it anyway. So, what's the
rationale?
Turning the unit off and on does not take you back where you were. It
does so if you let it power down on its own. But why this difference
in behavior? It's only one keystroke to get back to home screen if I
want to, but it's possibly several keystrokes to get back to the same
screen and position within it I was at when I turned it off manually.
So, on average, the user saves keystrokes by powering on where s/he
left off. (If opinions are divided over this, they could make it an
option to keep everyone happy.)
Pointing over the Settings icon (left of X) shows the current angle
setting (RAD, DEG, GRAD). The angle could be made a separate icon
(left of the Settings icon) for quick selection of the next angle
mode. Changing the angle setting is a common operation for some
problems.
The CTRL-ENTER forces an approximation when in EXACT mode. By, why
not do the opposite in APPROX mode (ie., force an EXACT answer)?
(This is the same with previous versions, and for TI-89 (Titanium).
So, this one applies to all these models.)
--
To post to this group, send email to tins...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe send email to tinspire+u...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.au/group/tinspire?hl=en-GB?hl=en-GB
The tns documents shared by group members are archived at
http://lafacroft.com/archive/nspire.php
About the scratchpad: Although, in my view, this is major functional improvement over v1.7 is there any reason for the scratchpad screen to be smaller than full-screen? The presumed effect of a pop-up window is not really necessary on such a small screen, especially when the window title clearly states it is the scratchpad; no possibility for confusion. So, why waste any bit of screen area just for a useless visual effect? About the keyboard: I think the new keyboard is more steps forward than back (and I'm planning on getting the new version just for that reason alone). Even though some keys were eliminated or merged into one key (like the SIN/COS/TAN keys), I think it's done in a very thoughtful and efficient way. For example, pressing TRIG/ENTER gives SINe, TRIG/TRIG/ENTER gives COSine, etc. Not too much of a hassle, considering the most frequent use is for SIN and COS. But I still don't get it why they did not make the keyboard QWERTY- style (both new and old)? (Is that just so the X, Y, and Z keys end up next to each other, or was there another, more serious, reason?) For anyone used to a computer keyboard, any different arrangement only slows things down. Even students who may not have learned QWERTY yet (I doubt there are any for the ages this calc targets), sooner or later, they will be forced to learn it anyway. So, what's the rationale? Turning the unit off and on does not take you back where you were. It does so if you let it power down on its own. But why this difference in behavior? It's only one keystroke to get back to home screen if I want to, but it's possibly several keystrokes to get back to the same screen and position within it I was at when I turned it off manually. So, on average, the user saves keystrokes by powering on where s/he left off. (If opinions are divided over this, they could make it an option to keep everyone happy.) Pointing over the Settings icon (left of X) shows the current angle setting (RAD, DEG, GRAD). The angle could be made a separate icon (left of the Settings icon) for quick selection of the next angle mode. Changing the angle setting is a common operation for some problems. The CTRL-ENTER forces an approximation when in EXACT mode. By, why not do the opposite in APPROX mode (ie., force an EXACT answer)? (This is the same with previous versions, and for TI-89 (Titanium). So, this one applies to all these models.) -- To post to this group, send email to tins...@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe send email to tinspire+u...@googlegroups.com<tinspire%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com.au/group/tinspire?hl=en-GB?hl=en-GB
> > The tns documents shared by group members are archived at
> >http://lafacroft.com/archive/nspire.php- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -