Install Roboto Font Windows 10

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Malva Ferster

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 4:07:41 AM8/5/24
to tingmusphiti
Youcan download and use as many Google fonts as you want. At the time of writing, there were over 1,500 font families to choose from. These come in serif, sans-serif, display, handwriting, and mono varieties.

Yes. In early 2022, Google fonts added Roboto Serif to its library. It's free to download, and you can install it just like Roboto. Use both on your system if you want."}},"@type": "Question","name": "Do I ever have to pay to use Roboto or other Google fonts?","acceptedAnswer": "@type": "Answer","text": "No. They are completely open source. According to Google, you're free to use them in both personal and commercial projects, completely free of cost. If you're an Android app developer, add the fonts to your apps.","@type": "Question","name": "Can I install other Google fonts at the same time?","acceptedAnswer": "@type": "Answer","text": "You can download and use as many Google fonts as you want. At the time of writing, there were over 1,500 font families to choose from. These come in serif, sans-serif, display, handwriting, and mono varieties. ","@type": "Question","name": "How can I tell if an image or site is using Roboto?","acceptedAnswer": "@type": "Answer","text": "If you're admiring the font on a website or in an image, there are quite a few useful tools to help you identify the font. This will quickly tell you whether the image or site is using Roboto or another font."]}Image credit: Google Fonts. All screenshots by Crystal Crowder.


Somewhat similar to this question, I'm looking for an alternative to Roboto. My office is pretty locked down. I can't install any new fonts either on my machine or firmwide, but I love the look of Roboto. I'm looking for a similar font that's included in the default Windows 7 fonts (defaults here) and to the extent there's a different/better fit in default Windows 10 (defaults here). Any thoughts/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.


You can see the list of the 30 most similar fonts for Roboto and Roboto 2014 on the left in each of these respective lists. Cross checking these against the list of available fonts in Windows 7 and Windows 10, it looks like Arial is the closest match. You could also use the fonts by appearance tool, which will help identify fonts with similar features (of course, not limited to those available in Windows by default).


As I use Roboto in more than one project (web sites and web apps, both desktop and responsive) I was thrilled to implement it immediately. The preview was clean and well spaced and all but while testing, I had to find out, that the Google Chrome (latest stable) on Windows has problems rendering the bold and bold-italic versions of the font.


The other font files seem to render correct and this one does so as well on Mac/Chrome but Win/Chrome has problems rendering Roboto bold and Roboto bolditalic for font sizes between 13px and 16px for a's and e's and between 10px and 14px for the i's.


If Roboto font is appearing distorted or narrower or whatever unexpected. Its because you have a version of the font in this case Roboto installed on your PC. Go to Control panel > Fonts and remove the roboto font installed on your system and happy you go. What is surprising however is the inability of Chrome to use the font from the web server and pick from the local system. Where as Edge and IE all use the font information from where its supposed to be used that being the web server.


If you have the latest version (v35 today) you can enable DirectWrite, which solved this issue for me.Just enter chrome://flags in the address bar, locate the Enable DirectWrite setting and click on Enable.


I am Windows 11, 64 bit and have Framemaker 2019 installed and updated to date for the last version available. I have Adobe Acrobat Pro 2020 also installed and updated to the latest version available. I have the Roboto Font Family installed in C:\Windows\Fonts. I have confirmed that all the fonts are properly installed. They are the Open Type fonts available from Google that I received from a client (and they from Google) and these are the exact same fonts that are available from (In fact, there is even the disclaimer for these fonts on the Adobe site that they are from Google.)


In Framemaker, when I am setting up my template and creating the necessary paragraph tags, all the installed Roboto font families are available on the Font tab in the Paragraph Designer and all the available variations w/in these families (Bold, Italic) are available as options, so all is working correctly in Framemaker 2019.


I always use the Publishing option in Framemaker to produce my PDFs. However, I always create a custom settings/job options file that stipulates the fonts that I want to embed for a specific template/client. (It's the standard procedure to do so, but for reference, see -framemaker-how-to-edit-the-pdf-preset-list/.)


When I am creating the custom job options file in Distiller 2020, this is where I run into the issue: Adobe Distiller is NOT recognizing all the installed Roboto fonts. In the Fonts source list, C:\Windows\Fonts, only a very small subset of all the installed Roboto fonts are available for selection. And it appears to be helter skelter as to which fonts are available for embedding and which are not. For example, none of the Roboto Thin variations and none of the Roboto Light variations are available, Roboto Black is available, but not Roboto Black Italic and yet all the variations of the Roboto Condensed (Bold, Italic, etc. ) are. And for reference, -not-showing-in-the-menu.html, none of these possible reasons is applicable and again, I have confirmed these reasons are not applicable with Adobe. Acrobat is simply not recognizing these fonts and I cannot create the needed custom job options file to properly embed the needed fonts in the final PDF.


I have been working with Adobe on this issue and they are just as stymied right now as I am and right now, so I thought that I would reach out to the community to see if anyone has run into this issue and what they did to resolve it.


And I have confirmed emphatically with Adobe support that Framemaker 2019 and Acrobat Pro 2020 do absolutely work and are supported on Windows 11. So far, FM2019 is cooperating, but the even newer product Adobe Acrobat Pro is the one giving me fits.


You could try to uninstall all Roboto fonts on your system, download the current version from the Google site. Be sure that the fonts don't get sourced from a different directory, like a local FrameMaker font directory. Furthermore, make sure that the Roboto fonts from Adobe fonts are not installed, as they may conflict with the local fonts.


I actually got the issue resolved and it took some assistance and a wonderful conversation with the long gone but still extremely missed Dov!! You are absolutely correct ins tating that the fonts from the Google site and the Adobe site differ in the font versions and for many reasons, I was given explicit instructions NOT to download the fonts from the Adobe site but go to the source, Google itself. The next issue involved how Microsoft also does not want to play nicely with fonts, whether with other vendors such as Adobe or incredibly their own users. In Windows 11, when you right-click a font to install it, you see a single option to "Install" on the context menu. If, however, you hold down the CTRL key and then click the font, the classic Windows context menu opens (the one that users have seen since forever) and it's on that menu that you get the option "Install for all users." That is how you absolutely should install a font on a Windows OS again for reasons that were explained to me and how it bypasses some of the cr*p that MS also tries with fonts. Now, when I open Adobe Distiller, and select Settings > Edit Adobe PDF Settings and open the Fonts tab, in the Embedding Font Source list, EVERY SINGLE Roboto font that I installed is displayed - not one is missing. I am back in business and thank you for confirming exactly some of the concerns that I had and what I did to resolve them.


I have Windows 10 and have tried to uninstall the Roboto font from the control panel, but get a message saying "cannot be deleted because it's in use". Even if I reboot my computer and go straight to the font panel, I get that message. I went to regedit and deleted all the Roboto fonts from "Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Fonts" and rebooted. Now I am left with the wrong font for Illustrator and XD. I install the latest Roboto font again and it is good in AI but not XD. Back to square one.


When I open the font families in XD I can see 3 "Regular" options for Roboto. Each one I select is the same, and they are all wrong. When I open families in AI, there is just one for Regular and it is correct.


Sorry to hear you are facing trouble. Would you mind sharing a sample file with me over a private message? Please upload the file to a shared location such as Creative Cloud app or Dropbox and share the url with me. It would be really helpful if you can share the screenshot of your about XD info page. Is your colleague using the same operating system?


Thank you Harshika - for some reason the notice of your reply went to my spam folder. I am on Windows 10 and my colleague has a Mac. Below is a screenshot of my XD install and I will send a message with link to an example file now. Thanks again for any help you can provide!


Any updates on this? I have exactly same problem with Roboto Slab rendition - it seems it messed up the font styles names and the real Regular and Black are not even in there, instead 3 Regular (which all are same Bold)


I've installed the Roboto typeface on my system but it turns out that the default, regular face is rendered as black, even though in the thumbnail it appears to be lighter. This happens on all applications, on Linux and Windows too. Here's an example:


This is how the thumbnails look on any file manager on Linux, the fonts seem fine (Windows doesn't even list the regular face on the collection). Windows only lists the normal face if I remove the black face:

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages