LishaI have to say, overall, I was surprised by how similar the unfinished rough cut is to the final version directed by Stan Winston. I had imagined there would be more drastic differences, but much of it looks remarkably similar.
To my way of thinking, the vilification of Michael Jackson occurred long before Evan Chandler got dollar signs in his eyes. Chandler and Rothman simply capitalized on the hysteria that already existed.
Where does this controversy focus its attention? Is it on his videos, his music, his wealth, his fame, his sexuality, his race, his lifestyle, his aesthetics, his unwillingness to be interviewed, his family, his plastic surgery, his skin lightening, or is it some ineffable combination of any or all of the above? What, at this moment, at the peak of his career, is he being attacked and criticized [for] on all sides?
For example, in the 1993 film, Michael Jackson first appears at approximately 6:20, as the mayor and the townspeople are hysterically confronting the Maestro. They claim the Maestro scares their children, but these are the very same children who smile warmly at him, giggle a lot, and are clearly delighted by his antics:
A great 2016 to both of you, its great that you have a new blog partner, Willa. We all certainly need a lot of more enlightenment as to questions of race and gender at all levels and walks of life, there are still far too many primitive biases prevalent.
Thanks Lisha, I really enjoy working on the MJ quilts, especially when I am trapped inside during the lousy Chicago winter. I wrote an article about the project that was published at LMJ online: -jackson-story-quilt-michaels-message-in-fabric-and-felt/
Your work is exquisite! Thank you so much Sandra for the article, which I thought was fascinating. I hope I am lucky enough someday to see these on display. Any chance you might consider showing them in Gary?
That was a fascinating read, Lisha. Reading his story is an important reminder of how and why there emerged such a generational divide between African-Americans of the Jim Crow generation vs. those who came of age post Civil Rights and post Black Power Movement. I think it is often easy for the younger and more politically correct to sometimes forget that it was a very different world for African Americans at that time, a world in which simply surviving was tantamount to all else, and where opportunities often had to be seized in whatever form they presented themselves. The Fetchit character as the embodiment of the African trickster figure does make a lot of sense, both from a historical perspective and, for Perry, as a means of gaining a foothold in an industry that was unwilling to give blacks representation other than as comic relief.
Both versions of the film are very interesting, but I really love the final version and watch it over and over, but would have loved it if the rebuilding of Michael by the children could have found its way into the final one.
This was a great discussion. To the question of what are the villagers so afraid of, it becomes increasingly clear over time that it was never anything other than candid assessment by MTV VJ Mark Goodman in 1983:
3a8082e126