Exporting from iMovie leads to heavy TMG CPU load

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Robert Brewer

unread,
Aug 24, 2010, 7:12:52 PM8/24/10
to TimeMachineGrowler discussion
I'm exporting a movie from iMovie, and I noticed in Activity Monitor
that TimeMachineGrowler is using substantial CPU. Every few seconds it
jumps to 2nd place just under iMovie, runs for a few seconds, then CPU
usage drops and the cycle repeats. I've only observed this when iMovie
is exporting a movie.

Any thoughts? Running TMG 1.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.4 on a Unibody
MacBook Pro 15"

Peter Hosey

unread,
Aug 25, 2010, 4:06:50 AM8/25/10
to timemachinegro...@googlegroups.com
On Aug 24, 2010, at 16:12:52, Robert Brewer wrote:
> … I noticed in Activity Monitor that TimeMachineGrowler is using substantial CPU. Every few seconds it jumps to 2nd place just under iMovie, runs for a few seconds, then CPU usage drops and the cycle repeats.

Correct. TimeMachineGrowler works by searching the Console log, and this is currently a CPU-intensive operation. Depending on how many messages you have in your Console log, it can be over quickly, take a few seconds, or even (in extreme cases) bog down for taking so long.

> I've only observed this when iMovie is exporting a movie.

That doesn't make a difference. You should notice the cores light up every ten seconds regardless.

Robert Brewer

unread,
Aug 29, 2010, 5:22:15 AM8/29/10
to timemachinegro...@googlegroups.com

You are quite right, I guess I just didn't notice it before. Is there a way
to make it scan the Console log less frequently? I think I'd be pretty
happy with scans happening every 30 or 60 seconds.

Peter Hosey

unread,
Aug 29, 2010, 5:24:10 AM8/29/10
to timemachinegro...@googlegroups.com
On Aug 29, 2010, at 02:22:15, Robert Brewer wrote:
> Is there a way to make it scan the Console log less frequently?

It's hard-coded, so the only way is to download the source code, change the poll interval there, build it, and run your custom build. This, of course, requires the developer tools.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages