acryl...@gmail.com
unread,Oct 30, 2008, 11:17:07 AM10/30/08Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Time as Money
Some farmers today survive year to year with their crops because they
are subsidized by the government to succeed. This of course means
that some foodstuffs are priced too low and it creates a "chicken and
egg" paradox for pricing. Once governments intervene with subsidies,
consumers will not pay higher prices for products. Farmers then become
dependent on the subsidies and slowly the market diverges from
accurate pricing.
Now, what if we determine the price according to a rough estimate of
the labor involved measured in time? Lets measure it out in the scale
of a minifarmer. Smaller farms or miro-farms can be
more productive in areas because they require less energy/pesticides/
equipment to manage.
Its said that a mini-farmer can grow on 3/4 acre enough food for 24
people working 40-45 hours a week. That's about 33000 square feet, or
imagine a big garden plot 180 feet x 180 feet. The raw labor divided
across 24 people with some profit (say, 3x-actual labor) means that
those 24 people can pay the mini-farmer 5 hours a week to farm food
for them and the farmer gets paid handsomely for being a veggie-
growing rockstar.
If the mini-farmer isn't growing for distinct individuals in a coop
like system, then the veggies will be sold ad-hoc to a market. There
the farmer can price the food per-item in a similar way, by keeping
track of the labor applied to the crop. If a farmer did 12 weeks of
work on just tomatoes(40 hrs/week or 480 hours of work x 3 = 1440
hours) to grow 43560 pints (a rough guess of a bumper crop of tomatoes
on 3/4 acre) ends up being 1.9 minutes a pint, with profit.
~A.