@@.bridgetable
|||||||||♠|T|5|3|
|||||||||!♥|Q|J|8|
|||||||||!♦|A|J|T|7|
|||||||||♣|Q|8|3|
|♠|K|4|||||||⌈|N|⌉||||||♠|Q|J|7|6|5|3|
|!♥|A|T|3||||||W| | ||||||!♥|K|T|9|4|
|!♦|K|T|8|5|4|||| | |E||||||!♦|2|
|♣|T|9|2||||||⌊|S|⌋||||||♣|K|4|
|||||||||♠|A|5|
|||||||||!♥|6|4|3|
|||||||||!♦|Q|8|4|
|||||||||♣|A|J|5|3|2|
@@
The only difference is in TWC the ! is replaced by @@color:red@@.
The CSS in both cases is the same:
.bridgetable tr:first-child th {color:red;text-align:center;}
.bridgetable td {background-color:white;}
.bridgetable {border-color:green;border-width:10px;}
.bridgetable th {background-color:white;color:red;}
.bridgetable,
.bridgetable td,
.bridgetable tr,
.bridgetable th
{ border:0 !important; margin:0 !important; padding:0px !important; text-align:center; }
Presumably the reason they show up differently is that the wikifier in TWC & TW5 converts the string to different HTML.