I agree a simple filter should should change both the edit tags a tagpill drop down so you can hide system tags, or specific tags after design. They could also be hidden on the view template as well.
However I was thinking the opposite could be true. The standard search ignores system tiddlers. We could add a system-caption field that is included in the standard search so an installed plugin can publish to users its manager tiddler without it being a non system tiddler, even still a shadow. This could also allow config tiddlers to appear in search. The standard search will only extend to text in the system-caption field in any shadow or tiddler.
I say this now because it should be the exception to your good idea.
Regards
Tony
I understand where you are coming from. There is a reasonable argument to keep this open in the standard distribution to keep things obvious yet tiddlywiki already hides things only experts can find and at other times is inconsistent
Tiddlywiki standard distribution has decided to hide system tiddlers and tags from the standard search. This helps keep things cleaner for users. This hidding is about clarity not secrecy. It has also chosen to hide the tags field and replace it with a special dialogue, hiding other fields as well.
Yet Tiddlywiki standard distribution has chosen not to hide system tags both on the tag bar or in edit mode.
Should this not be an option for clarity not secrecy?
Perhaps the best of both worlds is to hide system tags behind a more checkbox or an option to do so. This is all the more important since system tags are often a lot longer than standard tags.
I try to avoid expecting the user to use system tiddlers and prefer to give them easy "semantic" word based tags.
I would also like to hide fields the user needs a more advanced field selector (which I provide in the view template) to set rather than edit directly. I only recently worked out how to do this. I then add a design mode that unhides these fields with a click.
Food for thought?
Tony
In keeping with Mario's viewpoint and given my own musings can I suggest if you want to hide something you use the existing mechanisium as using the $:/ system namespace. Yes we need a way to reduce the inconsistencies in tiddlywiki but this is a big enough change to make it a plugin option - perhaps part of a designer toolset? I have more than a dozen items that that could be included in a designer plugin most of which can be removed or disabled after design time, a few that you would leave in like removing system items from display or edit for clarity.
Regards
Tony
Hi Mohammad,
By modifying two core tiddlers, you could filter your tags as presented in the edit template. A select widget would let you pick which group you wanted to see. That was the simplest solution I could come up with. It's something I've been thinking about for awhile, since it's often the case that you only need to see one of two or three sets of tag types.

Hi Mario,I got the point edit the related template and hide them by modifying the filters!
{{!!fieldname}}--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d58cfc1c-456a-4394-9169-fc8160329ec8%40googlegroups.com.