--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/be139b95-ded1-4c5e-b402-606c282af11a%40googlegroups.com.
How is NOT TW relevant to this forum?Oh, that's right, it's not.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019, 7:14 AM @TiddlyTweeter, <Tiddly...@assays.tv> wrote:
It nice, but its about TW.--I was interested in wiki NOT about TW.
On Wednesday, 28 August 2019 15:03:51 UTC+2, Dragon Cotterill wrote:Nothing a quick search won't find.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
I believe that one reason you do not see as much as you expect published on tiddlywiki is because perhaps the majority are used for personal and private content or at least restricted to a family, team or business. Presently the only wikis I have made public are about tiddlywiki.
However as my knowledge of tiddlywiki comes of age you may see more content published by me. My effort has being to develop tiddlywiki for rapid development but wether it becomes public or not will depend on the solution.
So yes we must encourage sharing of public wiki sites because they are possibly not as common yet as private sites.
I am considering publishing one on the united nations sustainable development goals so people and organisations can explore their own goals.
An old fashioned method used in the past was getting participating sites to list others next and previous sites of other publishers. Arriving at one site means you get to explore other sites in a circle with an index of participating sites. This is also a way to attract more visitors.
Perhaps we need an official registry of sites which seperates about tiddlywiki and other content.
Regards
Tony
I was interested in wiki NOT about TW.