--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddl...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
While we are at it, Jeremy… How would I make my newtiddler widget a proper official plugin? And also the let widget…
Anyhow, right now, we just have plugins packed into the main TW5 repo. That means that in your case there is the obstacle remaining of not being able to run the Node.js configuration of TW5. That means that you can't run the test suite, which makes it hard for to participate properly in core development.
Most TW5 components need to run under Node.js and in the browser, and so need to be tested in both places. I've discussed before that I intend to make it possible to create plugins within the browser, and over time it may become more practical for contributors to work entirely in the browser.
Am Montag, 27. Januar 2014 10:45:46 UTC+1 schrieb Jeremy Ruston:Anyhow, right now, we just have plugins packed into the main TW5 repo. That means that in your case there is the obstacle remaining of not being able to run the Node.js configuration of TW5. That means that you can't run the test suite, which makes it hard for to participate properly in core development.
But there is Mario's vagrant which I will for sure try out very soon. My shoulder is a real "pain in the neck" ;)
Most TW5 components need to run under Node.js and in the browser, and so need to be tested in both places. I've discussed before that I intend to make it possible to create plugins within the browser, and over time it may become more practical for contributors to work entirely in the browser.
So provided I can run node.js in vagrant - what do I need to add to my widgets to become proper plugins for the current "ecosystem"?
Hope, it will be better soon!
To be sure, the configuration works, I did create a pull request with the setting: https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/pull/351
The request wasn't merged, but the "pull jermolene, push origin" mechanism works. ... You should have a look at the videos, to adjust the git remote settings in the right way. first and second video should be ok ;) .... which reminds me to create a written version too :)
I think we should not establish a "workaround". We may not be able to "kill" it anymore.
I'd love to have a solution instead.
Thanks Appreciated