Thank you Jeremy for pointing this out. I understand the implications and dangers, especially when random is part of a filter run.
My use case is very simple, I only intend to generate an integer, which should be its final output (so, actually a string) and not an argument in any subsequent macro or filter operation.
The reason I originally asked for a random filter operator was based on the assumption that filters are central to so many things within TiddlyWiki, including maths.
I wasn't aware of the proposed shuffle operator. I will follow the developments.
Regards,
Hubert