... may I suggest the two terms
Transcluder (the tiddler that's doing the transclusion)Transcludee (the tiddler that's being transcluded)
reinhard...@gmail.com wrote:
The tiddler that’s referencing another tiddler is called the transcluder, the tiddler (content) that is being included is called the transcludee.
That would be it.
---
No, it wouldn't. The residual issue is positional reference. A transcluder is relative to a transcludee.
Without positional referencing you would not know what is transcluded from what is transcluding."No, it wouldn't. The residual issue is positional reference. A transcluder is relative to a transcludee.
Yes, of course. That' the whole crux of the matter. Any tiddler can take on both the role of a transcluder and a transcludee. It depends on the context. But given two tiddlers with a transclusion relationship there is never a doubt which tiddler is which.