To weigh of measure

163 views
Skip to first unread message

HeaveToo

unread,
May 1, 2014, 10:56:46 AM5/1/14
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
One thing that I have noticed lately is that I am more about measurements than weight.  For instance, if I catch a fish I will usually measure big ones.  It makes a lot more sense to me if I say I caught a 22" fish versus an 8 pound fish. 

How about you all?  Do you weigh of measure?  What makes more sense to you, weight or measurements, if a friend says that they caught a big fish and give you a weight or a measurement?

Truthfully I am thinking for a really big fish I wouldn't mind doing both.  That way I could get a nice release mount.

Scott Stankus

unread,
May 1, 2014, 11:08:57 AM5/1/14
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
I'm with you, I can visualize a fish much better if I'm given it's length rather than it's weight. Though I would also want to record both if I caught a really big fish!

--Scott


--
http://www.tpfr.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tidal Potomac Fly Rodders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tidal-potomac-fly-...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tidal-potomac-fly-rodders/4c69eb94-e81a-439f-8295-e123d30cf38e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--

================================================

"There are 10 types of people in this world, those who know binary, and those who don't"

Jeffrey Silvan

unread,
May 1, 2014, 11:20:10 AM5/1/14
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
For me, it typically depends on the species, although I almost never carry measuring devices of any sort. Generally, bigger species I tend to measure in pounds. For most freshwater, I would measure in inches - like mentioned, a 22" bass helps me understand size better than saying 4.5 pounds. I also don't care if it's an 8 oz brook trout versus a 10 oz brook trout. With most saltwater, though, I prefer to measure in pounds. When I'm bluefin tuna fishing, inches only matter so you know whether it's legal commercial size, but inches don't matter when I go to sell it. You want the 95" fish that weighs 400 lbs, not the 100" fish that weight 380. Similarly, I have no concept of length when it comes to trophy redfish. Sailfish and marlin are the exception, though. I only estimate weight based on length and girth.


Aden

unread,
May 1, 2014, 4:58:46 PM5/1/14
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
The problem with weighing and measuring is that when you tell your fish tales you will know you are lying. :-)

Bryan Lanier

unread,
May 1, 2014, 5:34:44 PM5/1/14
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
I like to approximate, then round up just to make sure I'm not lying!


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Aden <aden...@gmail.com> wrote:
The problem with weighing and measuring is that when you tell your fish tales you will know you are lying. :-)
--
http://www.tpfr.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tidal Potomac Fly Rodders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tidal-potomac-fly-...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com.

Carl Z.

unread,
May 2, 2014, 8:21:32 PM5/2/14
to tidal-potoma...@googlegroups.com
With bass, you go by pounds, with trout, by inches.  I don't know why, but it's convention.   To me, I usualy report in inches because I can measure it against my rod fairly accurately.




Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages