Hi,
> 1) Why does it think that it is a Voyage 200
> 2) Why no ID and Ram available amount?
Not sure.
> Sorry I forgot this question. Back in the day we had XT's and
> Sinclar's with trash eighties and so on. If i remember correctly a
> few of them had the Motorola 68K cpu. is this the same exact cpu that
> the 92+ has?
Yes, a number of 1980s computers are based on 68000 CPUs, or later
members of the 68k family.
> And if so why can't we program using GW Basic or Quick Basic or just >
plain old Basic?
Because nobody ported / reimplemented these ones for the TI-68k/AMS
platform. However, GFA Basic was reimplemented by Geoffrey "geogeo"
Anneheim for the TI-68k/AMS platform.
The processor is one thing; the accompanying devices and the software
environment are another one :)
> Did these machines have supporting chips with interpreters on them?
I'm not qualified enough about most 1980s computers, but I'd reply "no".
> I don't understand why my emulators are looking for a ROM dump and we
> have Fargo II and other software to help you get a ROM dump, and you
> tell me I don't need one.
Both TIEmu and VTI import the freely downloadable OS upgrades just fine.
From those, they build image files in their own format.
Bye,
Lionel.