Mobile devices are right in the middle of three booming technological trends: Internet of Things, Cloud Computing, and Big Data. The proliferation of mobile technology is perhaps the main reason, or at least one of the main reasons, for these trends to occur in the first place. In 2015, 377.9 million wireless subscriber connections of smartphones, tablets, and feature phones occurred in the United States.
Nowadays, mobile device use is as pervasive as it is helpful, especially in the context of digital forensics, because these small-sized machines amass huge quantities of data on a daily basis, which can be extracted to facilitate the investigation. Being something like a digital extension of ourselves, these machines allow digital forensic investigators to glean a lot of information.
The mobile forensics process aims to recover digital evidence or relevant data from a mobile device in a way that will preserve the evidence in a forensically sound condition. To achieve that, the mobile forensic process needs to set out precise rules that will seize, isolate, transport, store for analysis and proof digital evidence safely originating from mobile devices.
Usually, the mobile forensics process is similar to the ones in other branches of digital forensics. Nevertheless, one should know that the mobile forensics process has its own particularities that need to be considered. Following correct methodology and guidelines is a vital precondition for the examination of mobile devices to yield good results.
Digital forensics operates on the principle that evidence should always be adequately preserved, processed, and admissible in a court of law. Some legal considerations go hand in hand with the confiscation of mobile devices.
Mobile devices are often seized switched on; and since the purpose of their confiscation is to preserve evidence, the best way to transport them is to attempt to keep them turned on to avoid a shutdown, which would inevitably alter files.
A Faraday box/bag and external power supply are common types of equipment for conducting mobile forensics. While the former is a container specifically designed to isolate mobile devices from network communications and, at the same time, help with the safe transportation of evidence to the laboratory, the latter, is a power source embedded inside the Faraday box/bag. Before putting the phone in the Faraday bag, disconnect it from the network, disable all network connections (Wi-Fi, GPS, Hotspots, etc.), and activate the flight mode to protect the integrity of the evidence.
Last but not least, investigators should beware of mobile devices being connected to unknown incendiary devices, as well as any other booby trap set up to cause bodily harm or death to anyone at the crime scene.
The goal of this phase is to retrieve data from the mobile device. A locked screen can be unlocked with the right PIN, password, pattern, or biometrics (Note that biometric approaches while convenient are not always protected by the fifth amendment of the U.S. Constitution). According to a ruling by the Virginia Circuit Court, passcodes are protected, fingerprints not. Also, similar lock measures may exist on apps, images, SMSs, or messengers. Encryption, on the other hand, provides security on a software and/or hardware level that is often impossible to circumvent.
After one identifies the data sources, the next step is to collect the information properly. There are certain unique challenges concerning gathering information in the context of mobile technology. Many mobile devices cannot be collected by creating an image and instead they may have to undergo a process called acquisition of data. Thera are various protocols for collecting data from mobile devices as certain design specifications may only allow one type of acquisition.
The examiner may need to use numerous forensic tools to acquire and analyze data residing in the machine. Due to the sheer diversity of mobile devices, there is no one-size-fits-all solution regarding mobile forensic tools. Consequently, it is advisable to use more than one tool for examination. AccessData, Sleuthkit, and EnCase are some popular forensic software products that have analytic capabilities. The most appropriate tool(s) is being chosen depending on the type and model of mobile device.
All of the information, evidence, and other findings extracted, analyzed, and documented throughout the investigation should be presented to any other forensic examiner or a court in a clear, concise, and complete manner.
Quick Question: What procedure could the McLennan County law enforcement have used immediately at the crime scene to reduce the large backlogs of digital forensics casework at the outset (provided that they had the experts to carry out that procedure)?
Non-invasive methods can deal with other tasks, such as unlocking the SIM lock or/and the operator lock, the operating system update, IMEI number modification, etc. These techniques are virtually inapplicable in cases where the device has sustained severe physical damage. Types of non-invasive mobile forensic methods:
This approach involves instituting a connection between the mobile device and the forensic workstation using a USB cable, Bluetooth, Infrared or RJ-45 cable. Following the connecting part, the computer sends command requests to the device, and the device sends back data from its memory. The majority of forensic tools support logical extraction, and the process itself requires short-term training. On the downside, however, this technique may add data to the mobile device and may alter the integrity of the evidence. Also, deleted data is rarely accessible.
JTAG is a non-invasive form of physical acquisition that could extract data from a mobile device even when data was difficult to access through software avenues because the device is damaged, locked or encrypted. The device, however, must be at least partially functional (minor damages would not hinder this method).
Typically, they are longer and more complex. In cases where the device is entirely non-functional due to some severe damage, it is very likely the only way to retrieve data from the device might be to manually remove and image the flash memory chips of the device. Even if the device or item is in good condition, circumstances may require the forensic expert to acquire the chip's contents physically.
This method refers to manually taking an all-around view through the lenses of an electron microscope and analyzing data seen on the memory chip, more specifically the physical gates on the chip. In a nutshell, micro read is a method that demands utmost level of expertise, it is costly and time-consuming, and is reserved for serious national security crises.
FOR585: Smartphone Forensic Analysis In-Depth course provides examiners and investigators with advanced skills to detect, decode, decrypt, and correctly interpret evidence recovered from mobile devices. The course is continuously updated to keep up with the latest file formats, malware, smartphone operating systems, third-party applications, acquisition shortfalls, extraction techniques (how to get full file system or physical access) and encryption. It offers the most unique and current instruction to arm you with mobile device forensic knowledge you can immediately apply to cases you're working on the day you get back to work. 22 labs, bonus labs + CTF
A smartphone lands on your desk and you are tasked with determining if the user was at a specific location at a specific date and time. You rely on your forensic tools to dump and parse the data. The tools show location information tying the device to the place of interest. Are you ready to prove the user was at that location? Do you know how to take this further to place the subject at the location of interest at that specific date and time? Tread carefully, because the user may not have done what the tools are showing!
Mobile devices are often a key factor in criminal cases, intrusions, IP theft, security threats, accident reconstruction, and more. Understanding how to leverage the data from the device in a correct manner can make or break your case and your future as an expert. FOR585: Smartphone Forensic Analysis In-Depth will teach you those skills.
Every time the smartphone "thinks" or makes a suggestion, the data is saved. It's easy to get mixed up in what the forensic tools are reporting. Smartphone forensics is more than pressing the "find evidence" button and getting answers. Your team cannot afford to rely solely on the tools in your lab. You must understand how to use them correctly to guide your investigation, instead of just letting the tool report what it believes happened on the device. It is impossible for commercial tools to parse everything from smartphones and understand how the data was put on the device. Consider AI vs human - how can a tool determine that level of granularity from a data set? Examination and interpretation of the data is your job, and this course will provide you and your organization with the capability to find and examine the correct evidence from smartphones with confidence.
This in-depth smartphone forensic course provides examiners and investigators with advanced skills to detect, decode, decrypt, and correctly interpret evidence recovered from mobile devices. The course features 23 hands-on labs, a forensic challenge, bonus labs, and a bonus take-home case that allows students to analyze different datasets from smart devices and leverage the best forensic tools, methods, and custom scripts to learn how smartphone data hide and can be easily misinterpreted by forensic tools. Each lab is designed to teach you a lesson that can be applied to other smartphones. You will gain experience with the different data formats on multiple platforms and learn how the data are stored and encoded on each type of smart device. The labs will open your eyes to what you are missing by relying 100% on your forensic tools. The course will also introduce community created tools that are designed to parse specific artifacts that compliment commercial tools.
c80f0f1006