Ed, two shows I watch are on the absolute opposite ends of realism when it comes to hacking.
On Leverage, the team's hacker is Hardison, and he can essentially do magic. With his equipment he can very easily make anything happen on a computer. He is, for all intents and purposes, a wizard. His rival is played by Wil Wheaton, and he too is a wizard who can do anything whenever he wants.
On Person of Interest, Mr. Finch (Michael Emerson from Lost!) does the hacking and it's a meticulous process. He runs into pitfalls and dead ends, and when dealing with very high security systems, he sometimes makes no headway at all. When he does get into systems, he can't perform "magic," he can only explore the data and get intelligence, useful or otherwise. His rival, a hacker who goes by the handle "Root," (the gal who Fred on Angel!) was seen to essentially deny his attacks and turn back his attempts at breaking into a database when they went "head to head," while at the same time trying to backdoor into his own system.
Even though Person Of Interest has a very high concept, essentially science-fiction concept at its core (that there is a supercomputer observing every move and every word of everyone in New York and thus is able to predict the likelihood of someone being involved in a violent crime), the way which the methodology is presented is much more realistic than on Leverage, which ostensibly has no fantastical elements (team of professional thieves pull cons and heists against morally dubious targets) but routinely uses technology as magic.
Amazingly, they both work. Person of Interest is a "heavy" show, with a lot of investigation, violence, and subplots. Leverage is very much a "light" show, designed to be fun and clever above most everything else.
Just some food for thought.
--
This post/e-mail was written by Michael Bailey, Superman Apologist
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Unique Geek" group.