Plain English Physics 101 Part 2 modified 6/14/12

[thejohnlreed]

Plain English Physics 101
Part 2 Excerpts from:
Published under new title
Modified Monday, June 14, 2012
johnlawrencereed jr


Excerpt on Avogadro's Number:

I have defined mass as the conserved comparative resistance of non-
uniform (and uniform) atoms in response to and as a consequence of a
uniform attraction on all atoms (see Part 1, this publication).


We get close to this when we measure amounts of atoms or molecules in
moles as we optimize our chemical reactions. The relative atomic
weight of an atom expressed in grams as weight [mg] using the periodic
chart represents one mole of that element.


Although we call this an atomic weight [mg] one mole of an element
represents a specific number of atoms. That number is Avogadro's
Number 6.0221415 × 10^23.


That number represents the number of atoms in a gram atom, or the gram
atomic number of an element. Straight from the Periodic Table we have
the gram atomic number of each element that is equivalent to the
weight of 6.0221415 x 10^23 atoms of that element expressed in grams
at location.


The balance scale measures the comparative resistance [m] of atoms
which we interpret in units of weight [mg]. Weight will vary with
location but the comparative resistance of a number of atoms is
invariant with location. In this case that number of atoms is
designated as 1 mole of an element and the chemical numerical notation
proportionally references moles of elements. This number is consistent
with grams but is also consistent with any other standard unit we
might use to measure resistance on the balance scale and/or in impact
experiments.

To keep it simple the gram atomic number of Hydrogen can be
represented roughly as 1. Oxygen then, represented roughly is 16. We
have 2 gram atoms of Hydrogen and one gram atom of Oxygen as the
chemical representation for water H2O. Each gram atom is equivalent to
6.0221415 x 10^23 atoms of the element. They are the proportional
amounts using weight [mg] that are reacted to make water H2O. Here
each molecule of water consists of 6.0221415 x 10^23 water atoms.

Avogadro's Number [N] in this case (the periodic table) is a constant
of proportionality for the stable atomic chemical formulation of the
elemental compounds when represented in units (moles) that we measure
as weight [mg]. We say 2 moles of hydrogen combined with 1 mole of
oxygen is the chemical composition of water [H2O]. Or we can say 1
mole of Hydrogen combined with .5 moles of Oxygen is the chemical
composition of water [H2O]. Any proportional amount of the number of
atoms of each element using Avogadro's number as the reference will
provide an invariant platform that is independent of location.


Electrolysis and separation confirms this as measured on a balance
scale in units of mass [m] as [mg] weight. Here [m] is the comparative
conserved resistance and [mg] is the comparative weight taken at
location [g]..


The atomic number of an element is expressed in gram atoms or moles.
The Periodic Chart arranges the elements in Mass units that represent
a specific number of atoms for each element. This is Avogadro's
number. So when we determine that water has two hydrogen atoms and
one oxygen atom and this is expressed in mass units that represent a
near precise number of atoms (moles) our Periodic Table represents the
relative resistance of each element in mass units (moles) that define
the number of atoms of each element as a unit multiple of Avogadro's
number, at any location in the universe. Note that we are dealing
with an invariant number of atoms and we use the variant weight [mg]
which applies here and is functional at any location in space.

However, on the balance scale [g] is a consequence of location and
divides out of the equation. In other words the weight of the atoms
change according to location but the number of atoms and their
comparative resistance is invariant with respect to location.

The constant objective factor here is the comparative resistance [m]
of the number of atoms. Not the subjective comparative weight (what
we feel) [mg] (that depends on location) of a number of atoms. Using
a balance scale Mass is a convenient means by which we can represent
the comparative resistance of a number of uniform and non-uniform
atoms acted upon uniformly by the planet attractor.


Consequently our effort we call force [F] set equivalent to [mg]
cannot be generalized as an equal and opposite effort by the planet.
It is mass resistance [m] in motion that we feel as Force [mg] and
[ma], and experience as momentum [mv].


Inanimate objects exert no effort and feel no force. Mass [m]
resistance is invariant and Force [F] as we have defined it is based
on what we feel anywhere in the universe (anywhere we can occupy)
which is variant with [g] in [mg].

All atoms fall at the same rate. The planet attractor acts uniformly
on atoms. We lift or work against the cumulative sum of the non-
uniform resistance of the atoms in an object. The planet attractor
pulls uniformly on the object's non-uniform atoms and on our non-
uniform atoms as we lift the object. To assign the force we feel and
generate to inanimate object resistance is simple error.


The consolidating piece of this part of the puzzle came from the
recognition that I could show that gravity acts on atoms using the
principle that is the basis for the Periodic Table. It took me years
to put it together and it was right in front of me all along.
johnreed

Google has trashed my capability to examine and respond to comments
and questions using its interface to groups. Half of my screen is
locked into the advertising crap they use to force one to comply with
their new changes. I tried to comply there and the entire format is
foreign and unacceptable to me. Therefore any questions or comments
should be directed to the group below. Which is also a Google
platform so I cannot be certain that it will continue to function.
Thanks.

If you respond to this publication take care. Try to avoid
embarrassing your descendants. What I am providing will function in
one case as a segue for the foundation which will direct positive
attention to what have sometimes been called anti-gravity machines.
Once we recognize that gravity is what we feel, gravity will be
eliminated as a standard on which to base our theoretical mathematics
which presently define conservation laws. Once mass is recognized as a
convenient conserved representation for the comparative resistance of
numbers of atoms, the conservation of mass and energy will extend
beyond our subjective methods of interpretation and machines that
function within the new interpretation will not be burdened with the
dogma of the past. End.
johnreed

Current web address: http://groups.google.com/group/thejohnreed