thejohnlreed
unread,Dec 27, 2011, 10:23:04 PM12/27/11Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to The Least Action Consistent Universe and the Mathematics
-------When we use a balance scale to measure weight [mg] we are
making use of the quantity [g] that with respect to the balance scale
function, is a consequence of the balance scale's location in space.
The quantity [g] at the balance scale location acts uniformly on each
pan of the balance scale and on the observer, and persists as a
uniform attraction on the contents of each pan to bring the
comparative resistance quantity mass [m] to balance in the attraction
field that acts uniformly on atoms. The uniform quantity [g] at
location allows the observer to measure comparative magnitudes of non-
uniform atomic matter in conserved quantitative uniform units that the
observer feels as resistance and defines as mass [m]. The balance
scale compares the resistance of two pans of matter.
[mg]1 = [mg]2 on the balance scale where [g] divides out because it is
a uniform external to the balance scale influence on each pan.
The balance scale compares at any location [g] the resistance [m] of
the non-uniform pans of atomic matter. The observer feels the product
[mg] at location [g]. The observer views the conserved comparative
resistance [m] at any location, as a partial causal factor of the
variable location product, weight [mg], that the observer feels.
This is a sound conclusion.
The observer also concludes that the weight [mg] is equal and opposite
to a force the observer applies and feels [F=mg]. This is not a sound
conclusion. The quantity [mg] is a resistance that is equal to a force
the observer applies [F=mg]. This is a sound conclusion.
The math works either way.