Earth & Environment: Understaffing and funding cuts pose "worst nightmare" for weather warnings

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Scientific American

unread,
May 14, 2025, 1:00:41 PM5/14/25
to thechristi...@googlegroups.com

May 7—This week we look at what it means that 99.999 percent of the deep seafloor is unexplored, the ripple effects of a California requirement to label toxic chemicals, and the record number of people displaced by disasters last year.

Andrea Thompson, Senior Editor, Sustainability


Weather experts warn that staff cuts at the National Weather Service that have been made by the Trump administration are a danger to public safety as tornadoes, hurricanes and heat loom this spring and summer

A house destroyed by a hurricane submerged in floodwater

The National Weather Service is the source of all the data used for forecasting, whether the forecast comes for the NWS, the Weather Channel or some other entity. But firings and funding cuts instituted by the Trump administration have curtailed the weather balloon launches that gather some of that crucial data, and have put the agency's ability to maintain its weather radar systems (the only way we can spot tornadoes remotely) at risk. Former NWS directors, TV meteorologists, and industries such as insurance that depend on this information are extremely alarmed.

What are the stakes: Concerted federal government investment in studying the weather and building up U.S. observation systems have brought tornadoes warnings from virtually non-existent even in the mid-20th century to an average warning time of 8 to 18 minutes. Where hurricanes formerly rapidly intensified into monster storms with little or no foresight, we now have the ability to predict that likelihood at least a couple of days in advance. These advancements among many others have saved countless lives and billions of dollars. Improvements in hurricane forecasting alone have saved the nation $5 billion per storm since 2007.

What the experts say: “Our worst nightmare is that weather forecast offices will be so understaffed that there will be needless loss of life,” wrote five former NWS directors from both Democratic and Republican administrations in an open letter on May 2.—Andrea Thompson

Are you enjoying this newsletter? Dive deeper into the stories you care most about with a subscription to Scientific American.

Top Stories
We’ve Only Seen 0.001 Percent of Earth’s Seafloor. Here’s What That Really Means

A new review of ocean data suggests that more than 99.999 percent of the global deep seafloor has never been seen by humans. But what does that really mean?

Disasters Displaced a Record 46 Million People Last Year

In 2024 disasters displaced a record number of people both globally and in the U.S. About 11 million U.S. residents had to relocate to another part of the country because of hurricanes, floods and wildfires

California Told Companies to Label Toxic Chemicals. Instead They’re Quietly Dropping Them

Businesses are making moves to avoid consumer warning labels, and the effects reach far beyond California

U.K. Funds Geoengineering Experiments as Global Controversy Grows

Critics say U.K. investment in research on climate-cooling interventions, such as refreezing sea ice and brightening clouds, distracts from the need to cut planet-warming emissions

Today’s Children Face a Lifetime of Extreme Heat because of Climate Change

Young people today will be exposed to a number of heat waves that no one would have experienced before the burning of fossil fuels started raising global temperatures

What We're Reading
  • Millions of People Depend on the Great Lakes’ Water Supply. Trump Decimated the Lab Protecting It. | ProPublica
  • A rare New Zealand snail is filmed for the first time laying an egg from its neck | Associated Press
  • Chestnut tree giveaway in NYC aims to bring plant back from brink of extinction | Gothamist
  • Scientists Map Where Orphan Wells Pose Threats to Aquifers | Inside Climate News

From the Archive
It’s Time to Engineer the Sky

Global warming is so rampant that some scientists say we should begin altering the stratosphere to block incoming sunlight, even if it jeopardizes rain and crops

Subscribe to this and all of our newsletters here.

Scientific American
One New York Plaza, New York, NY, 10004
Support our mission, subscribe to Scientific American here
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages