Thanks for the thoughts Benjamin. I'm a regular user of Theatre Mix and think it's a great tool. Count me in as another user who would love compatibility with the DM7.
To consider Theatre Mix as the DM7 Theatre Package "on steroids" seems like a bit of a stretch. For DCA programming, management, and execution, as well as RF monitoring on the desk, Theatre Mix is quite good, and perhaps better or more efficient than what the DM7 Theatre Package offers? Again, I've only used it in a shop and with the online editor. But when considering the other features the Theatre Package offers - actor library and the associated EQ/dynamics banks, DCA grid view, and upgraded scene memory function come to mind - and all the other improvements to the rest of the desk more generally, the DM7 seems like the more advanced option.
CL with Theatre Mix may be the best option *for the money*, but not otherwise. Especially if at some later date, Theatre Mix starts working with DM7.
I hear you too on the personal preferences for the desk. Most of our designers are hired locally (Philadelphia area, US), and we're all used to using and programming CL/QL, as most budgets don't allow for more expensive desks. I'm imagining DM7 being the future preferred option for this level of theatre, and we're all excited around here to start learning and programming on them. Ultimately, it's usually about what's available or what the particular venue owns, vs. personal preference. And because we're a producing house, we're not taking tours or shows that have already been programmed.
On that note, I'm curious in general about how reliable the Yamaha File Converter program is? I've never used it. It doesn't look like it supports DM7 yet, but I'm sure it will soon.