Re: [theatre-sound-list] Digest for theatre-sound-list@googlegroups.com - 2 updates in 1 topic

29 views
Skip to first unread message

Tim McCulloch

unread,
May 17, 2024, 10:27:00 AMMay 17
to theatre-s...@googlegroups.com
<sigh>
I've been a gear pimp for 40+ years.  "Whatever ya want, just sign a 3 year contract."

The discussion of powered-in-the-box vs old school "amplifiers on the ground" is mostly academic at this point - pretty much all professional loudspeakers are competent designs, the question is do we run speaker cable or power cable up the pick?  In most use cases the results are a wash; the space we don't use for amp racks is taken by other necessities of the audio system.

IMNSHO the primary criteria for a theatrical loudspeaker system is one of linear coverage of all audience areas and appropriate support of auxiliary coverage areas; that can be voiced as needed by the designer or operating staff.  Use of products from a single manufacturer can make this easier, but is not a requirement with a good system engineer and appropriate system DSP.

I'm guessing the original post was regarding replacement of front/apron fill loudspeakers in a fixed installation.  If the house is happy with the perceived sound quality and support from EAW, ring them up and have a chat about current products in their model lines. If a suitable product must come from a different manufacturer, aside from how to integrate the new product into the venue's installed system, a question exists about the longevity of support for the remainder of the audio system and if, perhaps, it is time to look at full replacement.

Tim McCulloch
A1, IATSE L190

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:05 PM <theatre-s...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Nick Kourtides <nickko...@gmail.com>: May 15 02:46PM -0400

I think modern design practices around conventionally amplified speakers
have to grapple with how much passive, high-level filtering and phase
correction is it reasonable to do at the speaker/crossover network in the
box?
 
Good passive designs of the past, like EAW smaller KF and JF series, and
others, relied on complex and expensive filtering components AND also
significantly larger amplifiers for equivalent headroom. I would
regularly drive JFs and KFs, and especially the MK installation series,
with bridged amps at 1500-2000W *per driver. *
 
 
Nick Kourtides
Sound Design
(he/him)
+1 215 915 0159
nickko...@gmail.com
 
 
jer...@jjlee.com: May 15 02:05PM -0700

I think it’s a whole different thing than the “good old days”.
 
Back then, any speaker tuning was done by ear (no real analysis tools) and with an analog crossover. Speakers weren’t designed to work together and sum well. People used 1/3 octave graphics on everything.
 
We now have real tools. The speakers can be designed to be hyper efficient. Phase and frequency response can be taken care of in DSP as well as transient response and damping factor. Voltage limiters protect the speakers.
 
Some companies try to be purist today (KV2) but suffer from lack of DSP. They can’t really align their drivers to create a coherent wavefront the way you can with FIR filters.
 
The basics remain. You need a good driver in a good cabinet with good materials.
 
mobile +1 347.276.9468
web www.jjlee.com
email  jer...@jjlee.com
 
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to theatre-sound-l...@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages