How governments will be drawn into The World Peace Plan

[Karen Holmes (Suzeranda)]

This plan does not come from any government. Change must come from
within a culture--even a global culture--when people are ready for it
to come. Change cannot come from outside or it will meet resistance.
People must be ready for change.

The war in Iraq started a series of ripples, and eventually every
person on the planet will be affected in some way. This is a movement.
This set the stage for world peace. The first people to come into a
movement are those who stand on the principles. The second are
financially affected. The third group are those whose lives are
affected. (Actually, the final 25% are those who vote for the plan!)

The idea is going out to the people, and people are ready for it to
come. We know that the present structure is flawed, and it is
collapsing. The games played by people and government are too
oppressive. We see a "dark cloud on the horizon."

As the old is collapsing, something new and that functions on a higher
level must be building. It is not acceptable to allow an entire
collapse of the old without something new to replace it on a higher
level. We must not allow fears to tear apart the entire planet. We
must not devolve into chaos.

Ripple by ripple, as people see the crisis from their own perspective,
the plan will be introduced and opened to debate. No one will be left
out. If one individual or one government chooses to wait and see, that
is fine. The rest of us will continue to debate, and eventually,
everyone will make a choice--will vote.

This plan is coming from the people, not the governments. We will host
a conference in Europe when it is time, and the invitations will come
from the people--from this organization-- through the people of the
nation. It is OK if a government chooses to wait and see. No one will
be left out of the debate; every perspective must be considered valid,
and be addressed, and that means there will be no resistance to the
plan.

We are also offering proposals to various nations that are in crisis.
The proposals offer solutions to the issues based on how it will be
resolved by the international government. As the government addresses
the issues, they become advocates of the solution. Our organization
does not need plenipotentiary power to resolve issues, but can work
with the government in crisis, and they become advocates of the
concept in the international government.

Karen Holmes

[Monist]

Karen, your thinking so mirrors mine! I could write a long comment
but I think it would be quicker and easier (I am a lazy guy) to just
give you the links to where I have already posted my thoughts:

http://www.weonepeople.com

http://groups.google.com/group/one-world-party

I hope you like my thoughts as much as I like yours.


Norbert D'Costa

[Karen Holmes (Suzeranda)]

Thank you for your comments. You blog is very interesting. We seem to
have the same goal, but slightly different paths.

The existing structure is collapsing, and something has to be building
to replace it. The two concepts of the U.S.Constitution and the
cooperation of nature have already proven they work. America has been
the "land where the streets are paved with gold" for a long time,
destination for many people from every country. The cooperation of
nature has worked perfectly for billionsof years.

Time to make this come about. I have been working on the concept of
the Unified Field Theory. It concept, as you said, are that , whose
application is we are all One. It is one planet, and one Universe.

The counterpoint of it is conflict resolution, because if we are one,
the parts have to start to unify while maintaining individuality. We
have to find the same goal, and all work together on it.

Keep in touch.

Karen