Karen Holmes (Suzeranda)
unread,Sep 14, 2010, 11:05:15 AM9/14/10Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to The World Peace Plan
The first 8 proposals have gone to the ambassadors in Washington, DC
in the form of our "World Peace" newsletters. The proposals offer a
new perspective on how to deal with issues for the United States,
Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, DRCongo, Cyprus, North/South Korea and
Lebanon based on the World Peace Plan. The seed has been planted. Now
it is time to take these proposals another step forward with our
embassy books. They explain why what the world's leaders have been
attempting to do doesn't work.
We are introducing our plan, but it goes much deeper than that. People
are 180 degrees from where they think they are, and insisting what
they are doing is working. The contingency for our plan had to be met
before anyone would listen. People have been squeezed to understand
that the old structure doesn't work before they would let go of it.
Why change if things are working? The power games had to reach their
ultimate conclusion.
Not all people have reached this point. Some people are moving forward
with the understanding they can still function under the old
structure. They believe they can take advantage of the situation.
You can see this in the United States with the battle the Republicans
are waging to take back control of the U.S. Congress. The Democrats
have demonstrated their plan isn't sufficient to stabilize the
economy, and are losing power. But then, the Republicans don't have a
plan that people will agree to, either. Nor, the TEA party, who are
standing in protest. "'Kick the bums out!' is not a plan."
This is happening all over the world. As the United States is falling
in power, others are grabbing for power. This month, several world
leaders are coming to the U.N. to declare they have the right to
nuclear power. That they are equal. But, no one trusts them not to use
nuclear power to wage war. They don't have a plan anyone will agree
to. They must address conflict resolution first.
Step by step, we are dragging the world's leaders around the circle.
That we have affiliate members now in 38 countries enables us to
leverage the ambassadors to listen. They are talking amongst
themselves in their little diplomatic community. They are passing this
plan on to their governments, who are talking about it, too. If 189
other governments are talking about how the United States can offer
the entire world the same inalienable rights U.S. citizens now have,
why wage war? The seed is planted for world peace.
Karen Holmes,
Principal