At first reading (of the Revelation of Jesus Christ) I agreed with
you, Anonymous Responder. But then I wondered...if the Lord returns as
He said He will for the elects' sake, cutting the time short or else
there would be no flesh saved...why would He want to save them as
flesh beings and then immediately turn them to spirit? Why not just
let the whole world go up in smoke and then resurrect the ones He
wants?
And then, "virgins, not defiled with women"? One person actually stood
up in church and claimed that these were prepubescent boys who had
never had sex...with women!
Someone else said that these 144,000 had never been involved with that
woman of Babylon or her protesting daughters. But even they can
repent.
And since everyone who repents and accepts the sacrifice of the Lamb
of God becomes without sin...why couldn't the 144,000 be male or
female, former sinners who have been redeemed by the Savior and now
"virginal".
And if (as scripture says and I believe it) the dead in Christ rise
first and then "we who remain alive, are changed as in the twinkling
of an eye and rise up to meet Him in the air..." who does that leave
alive on earth? Only the unrepentant sinners... This buys in to the
rapture doctrine.
But the Lord has given us the parable of the "wheat and tares" in
Matthew 13 to rebut, well in advance, the doctrine that the good will
be "raptured away" leaving only the sinners to suffer the plagues of
the Revelation.
These seem like gnarley questions to me. So, what's the answer? Could
it be that there are more pieces to the puzzle than we have so far
seen...pieces that would make everything fall into place? If so, then
we "can't get there from here". We need to know more.
Theda