The Polar Vortex - Parts I and II...

[thesni...@aol.com]

So... you've always suspected that the liberal bugaboo of "global warming" is a hoax, perpetrated by a slimy hypocrite of a politician with a monstrous greed motive (Algore, who refuses to practice what he preaches), but you never had the hard facts to logically speak to your suspicions? 

Until now...  Here it is, friends, the real "Inconvenient Truth," laid out very simply and coherently, with a touch of ironic, morbid humor and a whole lot of unassailable logic.

It's downright fascinating (and delightful) to see how this guy can so efficiently eviscerate ALL of the basic arguments that the left has so relentlessly shoved down our throats about carbon footprints, rising sea levels, dying polar bears and the rest of the liberal hoax called "global warming."  It's all simply garbage, the motive being to steal money from the pockets of "makers," to be given to "takers," making it possible to buy their allegiance and their votes.  Whatever else would you expect of communists??

Cashu

============================


http://www.tpath.org/commentary.php


THE POLAR VORTEX
PART I 
THE NARRATIVE


 

Commentary By
Editor TPATH
Dwight Kehoe

Note from TPATH: At first glance this article will seem too long and too time consuming to read.  Please settle back, grab a hot tea or an adult beverage and take some time to read it.  We have spent months of time and effort to prepare and present this for you.  We promise you won't be disappointed and you will have some powerful talking points for your liberal friends. 


January 14, 2014 ~TPATH~  Alright, its time to admit it.  I'm a cynic.  You will have to excuse me for not accepting, without proof, anything people or groups preach without seeing some facts.   Especially if a particular group has an agenda aimed at confiscation and distribution of property they don't own or have any right to.

Having a business background in engineering, architecture, mathematics and software design, I may tend to require a bit more, shall we call it, tangible proof, than the average Joe.  So when I'm told that my activity is causing the end of the earth and man's existence thereon, you might say that I'm not willing to be herded into some theoretical vortex, without hard and tangible facts.

Despite having to deal with so much the leftists and progressives are relentlessly assaulting us with, I have spent the last several months acquiring data, analyzing it and as we say in mathematics, running the numbers.  Nothing one could do or say so clearly unveils preposterous claims as taking those claims to a final product and then examining them.

The information we will present here is accurate and has been checked and rechecked.  All of our calculations will be made available to anyone who requests them, but it is highly doubtful anyone from Al Gore's circles will want to be anywhere near this article.  For certain many of the calculations we did, would pretty much bore the furry pants off a polar bear, but I will try to present them in an interesting way that should keep you fascinated while providing you with facts for that crazy liberal uncle.  (Don't deny it, we all have a crazy lib somewhere in the family.)

Before we get into numbers, percentages, sea levels and carbon dioxide properties, it seems prudent to share (share, what a nice word!) with you some interesting facts and some of the many misrepresentations we discovered the global warming hoaxsters have been using for many years.  Long before they discovered their new favorite word, vortex.

THE POLAR BEAR AND THE ICE SHELF
How many of us and our children have seen the pictures of the forlorn and desperate, cuddly polar bear stranded on an ice berg not much larger than a lily pad, starving to death and hopelessly floating out to sea?  The phony story line for that is, because you drive an SUV all the land ice has disappeared and the polar bear is clinging to the last known piece of solid footing.

The truth about that polar bear and all polar bears is that aside from whales and dolphins, they are the most proficient swimmers in the mammal world.  In fact they spend more time in the water than do seals, walruses or even penguins.  Polar bears have been known to swim over 600 miles.  Its more likely that the polar bear in that picture was on that ice flow because it was fun.  And, distinctly opposite from what the global warming scammers have reported, the polar bear population has never been larger than it is today.

GLACIERS DO WHAT GRAVITY DEMANDS
The other pictures we are shown are those where the ice from the polar caps is dropping into the sea.  We are told that the rate of this loss is so alarming that in several years all this ice will have melted and raised the sea levels which will put homes in Kansas under water. All that needs to be done to keep this hoax going is for you to forget all the prior ominous predictions which have come and gone and just tremble over the new ones.

The Sierra Club which has made some of these videos and pictures available have refused to release information on where or when they where taken.  We found out why.  They were taken of glaciers which have not melted into the sea but have reached the sea.  All glaciers, whether it's cold or warm slide their way to sea level.  It's sort of what they do.  Its called gravity, not global warming.  Here's how it works.  Over the centuries, snow builds and compacts in the higher elevations of the polar regions.  The snow packs and as it gets deeper it becomes more dense and massively heavy.  They become formations called glaciers.

Because these glaciers are as much as two or three miles above sea level, after they become large enough and heavy enough, they start moving downward towards the sea.  The move is slow, relentless and unstoppable.  There are several massively huge glaciers and many smaller ones, which at all times, all seasons and all temperatures, are heading down the mountain.  And when they get to the sea what happens? They break off, fall in, and float away.  A polar bear may even find one for that rare photo op.  

The bottom line? Glaciers move downward toward the sea, regardless of how often you exhale C02.  Mass, weight and gravity move them. Nothing else.  

TEACHING YOUR CHILDREN THE EVILS OF CARBON DIOXIDE
During our research we found that social scientists are teaching your kids that carbon dioxide is a toxin and is killing fish and wildlife and destroying the earth.   One experiment we found them using is so blatantly illogical it's hard to imagine even those ideologues would have the nerve to teach it.  But they do. 

Here it is.  They put 100% pure oxygen in one sealed container and put 40% carbon dioxide and 60% oxygen in another.  They heat both containers and monitor how long it takes each to cool down once the heat source is removed.  Carbon dioxide which is much denser than oxygen will cool more slowly.   Of course if they had of heated cream cheese in another container it would have cooled even slower.  This so called "teaching aide" fails to inform the children that carbon dioxide in the air is .004% and about 10,000 times less than in the experiment.   It also ignores their main premise and that is, that C02, a greenhouse gas, blocks heat from escaping the earth, not warming it as a heated campfire rock would do in your sleeping bag.

To complete the absurdity of this propaganda its important to know the reason C02 was selected as the producer of global warming.   It is actually the only gas or bi-product of living, breathing and industry that can't be controlled.  Just plain carbon or carbon and chemical bi-products would not serve the purpose. They can be controlled.  A clean and cooler environment is not the objective. Confiscating your money is. 

Drowning polar bears, sliding glaciers and moronic science class propaganda are the only criteria in which the fools of this world have allowed themselves to me used and misled by leftists, communists and thieves.   You may find yourself in a discussion with a caring and concerned citizen environmentalist who may offer one or more of these items as proof, man is heating up the world.  

After you explain to them the reality of gravity and polar bear aquatics, and just before they start calling you names and describing what they think of your ancestry, you might try giving them a few of the facts we listed below and see what type of response you get. This is said, more or less tongue in cheek, because we all know actual facts tend to provoke even more turpitude from the "true believers".

BEING WRONG 100% OF THE TIME IS MOOTED BY THE POLAR VORTEX
 As you review or print out the data we have researched and the calculations we have provided below, keep in mind that not one, as in none, of the doomsday prognostications have come anywhere near reality.  In fact in almost every case, results are so erroneous its almost comical.  A case in point, as the hoax of all hoaxes is unraveling right under their elitist noses, in a last ditch effort to keep their money grubbing hands in our pockets, the New Polar Vortex, the savior of stupidity,  seems to have appeared right out of Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek.   

All you Trekkies out there will remember how the series used a combination of two or three technical words to form terms which in turn made the impossible seem plausible.  It was a cute little trick.  As in "Captain, the gravitational vortex is collapsing, I canut' hold er much longer!"  or "Scottie, can you increase the time warp vortex long enough for the nexus plasma to stabilize?'"  

Speaking of holding something together, the inventors of the fabricated "hockey Stick" theory have degenerated into continuing their failed charlatanism using terms Mr. Spock would be proud of.   If you haven't heard, according to these wizards of smarts, the world is suffering from extreme cold because man made global warming has created, heaven help us, the POLAR VORTEX.

Try to stay with us on this, the oceans have so heated up that they are sending huge amounts of globally warmed air and water currents up the north pole which forces all the below freezing arctic temperatures down the center of the continent.  And prest-o/change-o, you have warming causing freezing.  Its so simple. All you need is that Polar Vortex thing.   Oh yea, and another thing you would need, freezing arctic temperatures that these clowns said would be gone by 2014.   I guess if you are a leftist idiot, hell bent on continuing your scam, you can have it both ways.  

January 14, 2014 ~TPATH~  END PART I

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

POLAR VORTEX
PART II





 

Let's check the facts and run the numbers.


Commentary, facts and backup By:
Dwight Kehoe
Editor TPATH

February 2, 2014 ~TPATH~ As a result of this past week's compilation of deception and lies, better known as the State of the Union Address, where the fabrication of man made global warming was added to the list of other falsehoods, we felt it was time to re-post this earlier article.  We have added a few things and edited others for clarity.  So even if you read this on the original posting, you might like to review it.

 Carbon Dioxide is not a toxic or poisonous compound:
 If it were, anyone drinking soda, beer or champagne would be dead or sick.  Co2 is as vital to all life on this planet as is oxygen.  Without Co2, plants and vegetation would not exist nor would the animals which feed on it.  Algae and plankton (parts of which are plant life) would not exist, nor would the fish and marine mammals which feed on them.

In fact, in experiments, when Co2 levels in controlled environments were doubled and tripled the amounts found in the atmosphere, vegetables, fruits and all vegetation grew larger and healthier than those subjected to (normal) levels.

Co2 is heavier and denser than oxygen by almost 4 times.  For that reason carbon dioxide exists  at the highest percentage levels at or near sea level.  As a result, other gases such as ozone, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen and water vapor reside higher in the atmosphere and are much more likely to trap thermal temperatures, better known as the greenhouse effect.

It is a fact that Co2 in very high levels, within a sealed enclosure would displace oxygen and could therefore cause suffocation.  That person will not have been poisoned, he will simply have expired do to the lack of oxygen.  Far different from ozone, methane and carbon monoxide, which are truly toxic compounds. 

Higher amounts of Co2, in any possible percentage, does not effect global temperature:
Actually it's the converse.  Global temperatures effect Co2 levels.  Analyzing core samples have proven that Co2 percentages, spanning centuries, increase following rises in global temperature, not prior to it.  This one fact alone, the one the hoaxsters work most diligently to obscure, puts an end to the man made global warming charade.

Co2 has not risen significantly over the last 100 years of the industrial age:
At the turn of the 19th century Co2 levels were .0038% of the atmosphere. The latest global reading shows levels are now .0045%. That means, even if mankind was causing any significant rise in Co2 levels, which there is no proof of, it has risen just .0007% in well over a century.

Referencing the core samples above, Co2 levels, 100's of years before humans could have had any effect on them, were as much as 2 and 3 times higher than the present, and global temperatures were many degrees lower.

Global temperature increases in relation to Co2 elevations:
If Co2 levels increased because of humans and if that rise created elevated global temperatures, which neither do, at the rate humans are supposedly rising Co2 levels and comparing the actual global temperature increase during the  .0007% rise in Co2, the danger to mankind's existence would certainly not be imminent. 

For example, during the 100 year period referred to in an above paragraph, global temperatures have increased by just under one degree. With none of that increase coming during the last 17 years.  To put this into terms relative to a typical human life span, if the average temperature when you were born, and you are now 50 years old, was 68 degrees, you would now be sweltering in an unbearable 68 1/2  degrees.  And if you lived to be 100, you would have to endure as much as 69 degrees.

Or to put it another way, if humans were the factor in Co2 increases, and at the rate we have been accused of increasing it, it would take 1,425 years to increase Co2 levels by just 1%.  (Note: There is no proof man is responsible for this latest rise.  We are using their numbers simply to show the absurdity.)


Man's contribution to Co2:
Still supposing the Co2 humans are putting into the atmosphere is actually contributing to global warming, we have prepared some very interesting calculations.  This is where running the numbers gets to be fun. Unless of course if facts, calculations and common sense get in the way of emotionally driven ideology. 

During any given point in a year there is an approximated 186 billion tons of Co2 on the earth.  These estimated totals include accumulated Co2 in the land, sea and air.    Incorporating the data the hoaxsters love to quote, ....."humans and human activity contribute  6 billion tons annually to the planet's Carbon Dioxide totals", by running the numbers we come up with some very interesting facts.   

Keeping in mind we are using estimates provided by the leftist group known as The Sierra Club and taking into account the agenda they have, it's not difficult to imagine they just may have jacked up their estimates.   Those of their ilk have been known to manipulate data and write computer programs to produce predetermined results.  Be that as it may, we used their data  and have come up with these results.

Here is some math:
6 billion tons divided by 186 billion tons = .032 x  100 = 3.2%
Which means, during any one year period man's contribution to Co2 levels is 3.2%

Now, let's say we are really concerned about cutting back on the "human carbon footprint", here is a game plan to save the planet.  Suppose.....

• We eliminate half of the world population of 7.2 billion people to 3.6 billion.
• We shut down half of the world's factories and industry.
• We remove half of all cars, trains, trucks, tractors, ships and planes from use.
• We close and shutter half of every fuel consuming building in the world, which would include businesses, schools, hospitals, government buildings (not a bad idea there), and of course half the homes on the planet.

Doing this would cut in half, man's carbon footprint for that year.
Man's yearly carbon footprint = 3.2% of the total
Removing half of human activity would reduce that total by .016 x 100 = 1.6%

 The average Co2 percentage is .0045% 
1.6% (man's adjusted contribution) of .0045 = .00072%
.0045% (-) .00072% = .00378%

What do these numbers mean?  Two things.  The first thing it proves, is if half of mankind and everything associated with it were removed from existence, the amount of Co2 would be reduced by .00072%.  
The second thing it proves is man-made global warming is nothing more than hoax and a sinister scheme to confiscate from the productive, skim off huge amounts and then distribute the stolen wealth to those who have not earned it.



Polar ice and sea levels:
Let's run the numbers on some of these global warming alarms.

  A.  We have been told that 12 cubic miles of Greenland's ice is melting away every year and that will cause the sea levels to rise by 24 feet.  Algore has warned, by the winter of 2014, there would be no ice on the north pole.  Since that breathlessly proffered prognostication has not exactly come to fruition as the northern hemisphere is suffering the coldest winter in over 100 years, they needed a new explanation to explain the falsity of the old one.  Enter, the Polar Vortex.  This, according to them, explains how global warming is forcing warm air up to the pole and the result is that frigid weather is being forced south.  There you have it, global warming is causing global freezing.  No word from Algore as to how a 2014 no ice covered north pole is able to freeze the entire northern hemisphere.  But he's working on it.

Now, back to the sea levels.  Let's run a few more numbers.  Greenland, at last estimate, has 604,800 cubic miles of ice.  If, as they say, 12 cubic miles are melting every year, get your row boats ready, because at that rate it will take 50,400 years before it's all melted.  A bit deeper into the future than 2014.  One can never prepare too early so you may want to consider selling your beach front property, just to be safe, in say 25,000 years or so.

  B.  Of course, typical with most information the warming hoaxsters pretend to have calculated, this 24 foot rise is also much exaggerated.  We have done real and complete calculations based upon the world's connected waterways. Calculating the density of ice as compared to water and the total ice mass of the entire northern hemisphere.  What we found was the sea levels would rise just under 11 feet, but only after more than 2,500 generations, if it continued to melt at the rate they claim.  Which we see now, darn it, is just not happening.

Here is the basis, without showing all the calculations here, which you can do yourself or see ours upon request. There are 150,826,300 square miles of connected sea level bodies of water on this earth.  If every single particle of ice, in the entire northern hemisphere were to melt, the sea levels would rise just 19 feet.  This takes into account that large percentages of northern ice are incorporated in the oceans and seas.  Water volume increases by about 20% when frozen.  A large percentage of all melting ice resides in the oceans and seas and the volume would actually decrease where that is so. Those areas would actually see a negative rise in sea levels. 

 A little about what really causes global warming.  
Hint, its a big hot ball in the sky.
As we have shown, Co2 plays no role in planetary heating.  So what does?

Our planet is kept warm or cold by three major natural phenomenons.
   A. The Sun
   B. Ozone
   c. H2o (Water or more precisely, water vapor)

When the sun shines, it not only creates thermal heat which reaches the earth, but more importantly, solar particles crash into the oxygen in the upper atmosphere and creates Ozone. These solar particles vary in intensity as a result of sun activity known as solar flares.  The more active the solar flares, the more intense the particle collisions and the more Ozone is created.  Less solar activity, less Ozone.  Less Ozone = a cooler earth, more Ozone = a warmer earth.

Ozone is the number two rated greenhouse gas which follows the number one greenhouse gas, no its not Co2, its H20, humidity.   Ozone serves two major purposes.  

1. The most important is its ability to filter harmful radiation from the sun.  Without it, all life on this planet would cease to exist.  
2. The second is its ability to block echoed or bounced heat from leaving the earth and dissipating into outer space.

Ozone is very toxic to humans as well as viruses and bacteria, better know as germs.  It also has a very short life span as it breaks down into other elements less than 14 days after it's created.   Because of it's ability to kill germs and it's property of quick dissipation, hospitals and industry use it to disinfect entire operating rooms, laboratories  and buildings.

Bad news for man made global warming pirates:
The sun has fairly consistent cycles of solar flare activity with long and short periods of more and less activity.  The sun has been moving towards a less active period for several years now, and if patterns of the past continue, many years of less active solar flares are ahead.  Which in simple terms means, it's going to get cold.

As we continue to cool, as we have been doing for several years, you will need to decide if it's the Polar Vortex or the lack of a Solar Vortex.


February 2, 2014 ~TPATH

CONTACT TPATH   HERE
 

IF YOU MISSED
POLAR VORTEX PART I
READ IT HERE      

RESEARCH LINKS

LINK ONE



Without a doubt the best research data available
CLICK HERE


YOU CAN CONTACT TPATH
HERE