In an article by Ralph Byron Copper C.S., "Mary
Baker Eddy's Supreme Regard For The King James
Version Of The Bible", he refers to an archival accession
number from The Mary Baker Eddy Library to view a
complete document that addresses the issue of Mrs. Eddy's
choice of the King James Version. The number is
two chapters in our textbook are "inextricably linked,
verse-by verse with the specific translated words of
the King James Version". He reminds us also that there are
over five hundred passages from the King James Bible
quoted in "Science and Health". Copper writes, "Virtually
every page of "Science and Health" is filled with indirect
references, allusions, and metaphors drawn straight from
the KJV". In his article he tells us further that, "The
interrelation of these two books, in wording and meaning
forms a bond that cannot be safely or successfully
severed". And I would agree and ask how could they?
Together those two *specific* books form the Pastor for
Mary Baker Eddy's Church.
I will cite one whole paragraph that is crucial to this issue.
It indicates that if we want to be members of Mary Baker
Eddy's Church and not some other, we need to take heed.
Mr. Copper writes:
"Less than three years after Mrs. Eddy's passing, her student
Annie Knott (who had been chosen by Mrs. Eddy to serve
concurrently as an Editor and as a member of the Bible Lesson
Committee, and who would later become the first female
Director of The Mother Church) wrote in the "Christian Science
Sentinel": "Many years ago Mrs. Eddy decided that the Authorized
Version of the Bible, known as the King James Version, should
be used at all our services, because it expressed the truth with
sufficient clearness, to enable every earnest student to demonstrate
its power." (Sentinel, April 12, 1913, Vol. 15, p. 631)."
Finally Mr. Copper tells us that "Over decades different Boards
of Directors (including Directors who were taught by, or who
worked with, Mrs. Eddy - such as Adam Dickey, James Neal,
[said by Mrs. Eddy to be the finest healer], William Rathvon,
Annie Knott, George Wendell Adams, William McKenzie)
repeatedly issued statements upholding our Leader's expressed
choice." He closes his article advising that he is giving statements,
some of which I have now shared here, of "historical truth", and
he tells us that "These statements of historical truth affirm for
all time that the dual pastor of Mary Baker Eddy's Church is
invested to speak with one inspired voice - concordant in both
its wording and meaning".
Ralph Byron Copper, C.S., is in the public practice of Christian
Science. He has given many talks on Christian Science
including at Arden Wood, in San Francisco, CA. and at Longyear
in Chestnut Hill, Ma.
A document from The Mary Baker Eddy Library shows Mary Baker Eddy's
strong wording that she wishes no other Bible version be used in
conjunction with her textbook, although we do know that she appreciated
some other versions for her own study. Yet it was the King James Version
that she reached out to and healed her when she had her wonderful
healing in 1866. Here is a copy of the document.
RE: Wiggins ltr, Copper , etc.
Accession: L02166
Date Created: 1885/XX/XX
Author: MARY BAKER EDDY
Recipient: JAMES HENRY WIGGIN
______________________________
Dear Mr. Wiggin,
I am astonished that when so much depends on my getting out this book at an
earlier period than this, --- and have sent word to you by Mr. Frye1 twice that
I would have no new version, or any one, but the accepted St James version,
2 that you have in inserted another than the one I had placed in my copy.
Now this must come out, and it involves a loss to me in consuming time that you
seem ignorant of, notwithstanding all I have entreated on this score. The expense
I shall not assume and the delay I can scarcely endure.
Yours truly
MBG Eddy
N.B.
My notes on Genesis were upon from the above scriptural version. It
changes the uniformity to go off on another one.
* * * *end paste of copy * * *
In Christian Science only God is referred to with
capital letters otherwise if Jesus is so referenced it confuses
the issue as to whether Jesus is God - a view which orthodox
Christianity endorses in contrast to the Christian Science
view that Jesus is God's son and the "highest human corporeal
concept of the divine idea" S&H, p.59:16. The use of capital
letters for pronouns of course is perfectly fine regardless
of who is being referenced when they are used as the
first word in a sentence, since all sentences begin with capital
letters.
Recently citations in C. S. church services from the Responsive
Reading included a citation from the NKJV which used capital
pronouns that referred to Christ Jesus. The following
is a comparison of the citation in question including its lead in
citation followed by what Dummelow's One Volume Bible Commentary
explanation - first the KJV and then the New King James Version that was
used in the May 19-25 Bible Lesson.
KJV Phil 3:20, 21,
20 For our conversation is in heaven; from whence also
we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ;
21 Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned
like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby
he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.
---------------- now the NKJV
20 For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also
eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ,
21 who will transform our lowly body that it may be
conformed to *His* glorious body, according to the
working by which *He* is able even to subdue all things
to *Himself*.
( I did put stars around those pronouns in question)
Dummelow's Bible Commentary gives the following:
From the on line edition
" 20, 21. Against the earthly is set the heavenly mind and walk, described by a wordappealing to the Philippian civic consciousness (see Intro., and cp. Philippians 1:27): our citizenship (AV 'conversation')is in heaven! (cp. Revelation 21:2). As the distant Philippian 'colonus' belonged to Rome, so the Christian sojourning on earth is a citizen
who will refashion the body of our humiliation ('vile body,' AV, is a mistranslation), that it may
be conformable to the body of his glory. The Gk. adjective rendered 'conformable' appeared in
Romans 8:29;—'conformed to the image of God's Son': conformity of bodily state completes conformity The idea of 'the body of glory' was given him by the form of heavenly splendour in which he had seen
This transformation of the saints will be the supreme act of that mighty working in which Jesus
displays His power, as Lord of God's kingdom, to subjugate all things unto Himself: cp. Philippians 2:10-11 and Matthew 28:18. The human body is, from first to last, the object of His miracles
Thus, according to Dummelow's Commentary those pronouns with
capital letters in the verse in question, 21, refer to Jesus, as Paul
is recalling how he beheld Jesus on the road to Damascus. The
use of capitalized pronouns in this case is not appropriate to a
Christian Science church service and obscures and confuses what
Christian Science teaches concerning the identity of Jesus' as
God's son and not as God, Himself. This is another instance showing
that only the King James Version belong in Christian Science church
services and a plea to not rend the Pastor.
Paula