Bianca, here we go, I will give you my 2 cents on both girls you mentioned:
Amanda: Has a very technically sound game, did not work hard enough when she turned pro and unfortunately, her dad passed away at a very critical time in her career.
I believe that completely derailed her, she tried to continue to survive with wins here and there, she would give up during matches when things were not going her way.
Recently, she took several months off tennis and I think that helped her realize she is way better than 99% of these girls, so I think now that she is believing and putting in the hard work, she is beginning to win the matches she should be winning.
Next step is overcoming the big matches nerves.
Now, onto our girl Coco. All of us here love Coco, but in different ways we are frustrated. Coco is surviving on athleticism, hard work and mental strength.
Her game is technically garbage. Only the BH is a reliable shot. Coco won so much when she was a junior, not sure who her coach was back then but they did not put in the time to work on her tools.
Her FH is the one everyone knows they should hit to, 2-3 shots, it will give you a free point. What frustrates me about Coco is she is so much capable of ruling the tour if she could just take like a fall season off and work on her technical issues.
She is always at the mercy of the opponent. If the opponent has brains and is steady enough to find Coco's FH, it is over. She can serve like 10+ DFs a match and still win.
In a nutshell, she is just about staying in the rally and waiting for the opponent to start over-hitting. It is working for her, but she is capable of having all these matches on her racket.
She is young, so I don't buy the excuse of she can't retool. Sacrifice a year or 2 and enjoy the rest of your tennis career. She is always about to cry in each match due to these technical issues, players should enjoy what they do.
Ok, that is me, a frustrated Coco's aunt who will never be satisfied with the few grand slams she is has snatched from headcase Sabalenka.