On Aug 24, 12:44 am, videoman <
video...@ccountry.net> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review denizen! Is this new fluval internal filter any
> better than the original fluval (not msf, not 03, 04 series) internal
> filters? Is hagen going to stop manufacturing the original (as in the
> last many years original) fluval internal filter series?
With the first U4 I thought it was a new model filter. Actually it's
been in production a year or two, and the "U" series seems to have
replaced earlier submersible Fluval filters.
There's a previous-series Fluval submersible filter running here on a
15gal aquarium. It's filter #2 in the series, one up from the
smallest. This older filter lacks the carbon pads of the newer filter,
which pads I will discontinue using in any case, and the new filter
has a small but useful "bio-media" box that's mainly lacking on older
Fluval internal filters. The older Fluval has a red button-like flow
indicator (not useful) and very good flow control (useful). The U4 may
possibly be throttled by setting it partially to one of the 3 possible
discharge modes, but I haven't tried that yet. OTOH the upper or lower
or integrated discharge mode choices are actually useful. The older
Fluval also uses foam media, so I'd consider it a draw between the new
filter and the older one. Perhaps the new filter is more voluminous
than earlier models, with more media and better filtration at the cost
of visual bulk.
Manufacturers are always bringing out newer stuff. At the store I saw
a giant Fluval external fiter on which the lid seemed to be attached
with screws. It was grey with orange fittings, and the pump at the
bottom: impressive, affordable, but 'way too powerful for my
aquariums :) .
I previously had a still older internal Fluval filter from about 1991,
and it was also fine once its disposable cartridge was replaced with
the foam tube alternative. This older filter was supposed to have its
top out of water (Canada, eh). A result of the top being out of the
water is, that after 6 or 7 years the electric wire dried and cracked
near the filter top - dangerous so I discarded the filter. It was from
the nearby T12 fluorescent tube UV light, and possibly the type of
wire insulation used then. I've not seen the issue with the newer
internal filter or the heaters.
> What do you
> think of the new internal fluvals (yes or no?)? I do use a whisper 40i
> internal filter but might consider a new fluval u4 filter to replace
> it if it can handle a 2 inch water depth.
The U4 filter is a rectangular prism about 4 inches by 4 inches, so
even lying on its back it would need 5 inches or more of water depth.
If lying on its back the filter mainly takes water in the sides, and
it's discharged upwards. The smaller models (U4 is the biggest) might
handle shallower water, but my impression is the "U" series are fatter
than earlier Fluval submersibles.
> My whisper filter I
> previously mentioned tends to bypass because gravity doesn't work well
> enough for the water to be forced through the media so the water with
> detritus tends to flow over the media, the pump in it is powerful but
> in my estimation the filter isn't deep enough to prevent bypass, but
> other than that I love it, so I just hope it turns out over time to
> work good.
Just remembered that you keep turtles :o) . As far as I can see the U4
has no real possibility of bypass. Immediately behind the intake
screens covering 2 sides of the filter there are foam slabs, and in
the middle there's a hollow rectangular media box that feeds into the
water pump. The pump draws water out of the media box and discharges
it.
d.