lost some doc ?

[Tarek Ziadé]

Hey

is that me or we lost some doc at some point ?

http://hg.python.org/distutils2/file/6fca65ff60ad/docs/source/setupcfg-spec.rst

also, we need to document asap the [compilers] and [extensions] sections

Who's in ? :)

Cheers
Tarek

--
Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org

[Éric Araujo]

Hi,

> is that me or we lost some doc at some point ?
> http://hg.python.org/distutils2/file/6fca65ff60ad/docs/source/setupcfg-spec.rst

In my clone of bitbucket/tarek/d2, there was only the setupcfg.rst file,
not this duplicate setupcfg-spec.rst file. I have pulled it from
hg.python.org/d2 and am merging it with the existing
Doc/packaging/setupcfg.rst file. I should be able to push tomorrow.

> also, we need to document asap the [compilers] and [extensions] sections
> Who's in ? :)

I’d like to do it.

Cheers

[Éric Araujo]

>> is that me or we lost some doc at some point ?

I have now pushed a merged and improved version of
setupcfg/setupcfg-spec. Comments always welcome.

>> also, we need to document asap the [compilers] and [extensions] sections

> I’d like to do it.

In the absence of competition, I’m taking this one :)

Cheers

[Tarek Ziadé]

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Éric Araujo <win...@netwok.org> wrote:
>>> is that me or we lost some doc at some point ?
>
> I have now pushed a merged and improved version of
> setupcfg/setupcfg-spec.  Comments always welcome.

So just a heads-up on this file:

the goal is to publish a specification so we can start publising
setup.cfg files directly on PyPI.

>
>>> also, we need to document asap the [compilers] and [extensions] sections
>> I’d like to do it.
>
> In the absence of competition, I’m taking this one :)
>
> Cheers
>

--
Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org