I wonder whether there are academics out there who continue to swear by
index cards, and some of the more traditional approaches to organizing
article and thesis material?
Daly
I run into a couple of problems with purely electronic approaches to
getting work done. One is physical portability. I simply cannot assume
that I can have access to a computer or to the internet all the time,
given my lifestyle. If I feel like working, I would like to be able to
work. Paper-and-pen approaches allow this. (Even in church. Try that
with a computer.)
Another problem is one of the spatial size of the desktop. When I work
on the computer, my whole world view is this tiny little window. I
hunch my shoulders, lean into the screen, and spend all kinds of time
flipping between virtual windows. Having a large table or desk is
fabulously freeing. I can spread the work out over the entire desk and
floor if I want.
There is cost. Tinkerbox costs $192, and 500 index cards cost about
$1.40.
Then, there is my temptation to switch to some prettier-looking
software that is brand new and looks like it will do everything for me.
Has yet to ever be completely true. Once something is printed on paper,
I have no burning desire to "re-print" it in a new font or on new
stationary, but on the computer, trying out new software is a big
temptation. In the long run it's just not productive.
So, I personally have started to invest in all kinds of office supples.
I have Rubbermaid index card holders, Mead composition notebooks, a few
Moleskien journals that can fit in my pocket, and a Rubbermaid box for
toting big bunches of articles. It's all so very old school (at moments
I suddenly picture my father, going off to work at Rockwell
International as an engineer, carrying a briefcase and calculator and
sporting a pocket protector), but I can work just about anywhere,
anytime in a very hassle-free way. Fortunately I live in a small rural
city where I probably do not look as odd as someone working at a
research 1 institution doing this.
Darrell