Interesting.
I'm a non-treatment beekeeper; we don't treat for Varroa in our
backyard operation.
We keep swarms that we catch or the daughters of those colonies. no
out-of-area queens or colonies.
Since we started keeping bees in east Oakland in 2011, most of the
colonies have handled Varroa on their own.
They keep them below 2% or so. Zero mite counts are not unusual with
sugar-rolls. We keep 6 to 12 colonies most of the time. Our
success may partly be related to living in an area that's not
overcrowded with beekeepers like some
parts of north Oakland and Berkeley are. (drifting bees
transporting pathogens is the presumption)
In our dozen years of beekeeping we noticed that Varroa would spike
in an unusual way.
Over a week or two it would go up drastically. i.e. faster than
natural Varroa population growth can account for.
We concluded it was because the bee colony had been robbing Varroa
infested colonies, bringing back hitchhiker Varroa.
The Varroa influx exceeded the colony's capacity to keep them under
control. Parasitic Mite Syndrome (PMS) is the
common term describing the collapse of colonies due to Varroa
overload.
So the fact that you are counting 3% or more Varroa is interesting
to me.
I wonder why the circumstances are different than they are in our
neighborhood.
Are the bees from local swarms? Package? Out-of-area Nuc colony?
Is the neighborhood one of the high beekeeper density neighborhoods?
Are you measuring the # of Varroa on more than 300 bees? (half a
cup)
If you're in an area where there are a LOT of unmanaged colonies
(gear owned by "bee havers")
they could be infested, and nobody knows or cares.
A lot of the literature recommending treatment, and methods, assume
honey bees are generally
susceptible to Varroa, and have no defense against them. i.e. Varroa
populations naturally grow unchecked
until they reach a level that's fatal to the hive.
Since 2012 we've observed that colonies maintain their Varroa
population at a roughly constant level
(which varies from hive to hive) of a few percent.
A hitchhiking/robbing event can destabilize that equilibrium.
Sometimes hives cope, sometimes they don't.
So I suggest measuring the Varroa percentage for a couple of weeks
in a row before climbing aboard the treatment train.
If the Varroa percentage is growing, maybe it's because you got
susceptible bees (blame the queen and the drone she mated with).
If the percentage is stable or drops back down to a percent or
lower, then you had a transient event.
Another thing to be noted is that there are many bee trees in the
bay area, with successful colonies that
persist for years. Nobody treats them. The same is true for colonies
in attics, crawl-spaces, walls, etc.
Those bees are dealing with Varroa on their own.
Our operation leverages off of the resistant population, and feeds
good drones back into that population.
The pathogens chapters of bee books tend to be either a little bit
out of date, or way out of date.
Before Varroa, the big worry was tracheal mites. The next worry
(besides novel viruses) is
the new mite from Asia (
Tropilaelaps).
As a new beekeeper, you will decide where you stand on the issue of
treatment/non-treatment. It's sometimes a hot topic.
It depends on your outlook on beekeeping (why you too it up) and
whether you expect to
derive income from the hobby.
(fwiw our investment in equipment was retired within about 3 years
by honey sales; it doesn't work that way for everyone)
Questions?
jerry