Proposed Portuguese copyright law will make CC licenses illegal?

[Adriano Lima]

Eita porra!! http://t.co/rzRz9AB

Via Boing Boing 

Adriano Lima
11 8127-5134
http://www.flickr.com/photos/adrianolima

[Diego Rabatone]

Tem alguns comentários interessantes:

"Only if your a member of the Portugese society of artists. Don't become one and you can do anything.
Usually by becoming a member of Ascap/Bmi/Sacem/... ...(author societies), you give up a lot of rights. Example : In France, when a becoming a member of the Sacem (local ASCAP), you give them the right to sell your music to TV channels without your consent (news broadcasts for ex., but not advertising or TV series). This became a big issue when DAFT PUNK refused to sign with SACEM because they wanted total control of the use their music. I think SACEM is still holding a lot of their money, i don't think they ever signed with the French author society.
So it's a case of money or freedom :)"

"Not sure this is quite as bad as it seems. Presumably there is a difference between a `licence' and an `alienation'. By granting a creative commons licence, the author of a work does not lose the right to licence the work on 'non-free' terms.

Why someone would choose to purchase a non-free license when a free one is available is another question--it could even make sense where there is a no commercial works or no derivatives license.

Releasing a work into the public domain? Now that might be prohibited by the law."

E foi colocada uma pergunta legal também...... Isso pode detonar com os contratos entre artistas/autores e produtoras/editoras....

--------------------------------
Diego Rabatone Oliveira
http://blog.diraol.eng.br
diraol(arroba)diraol(ponto)eng(ponto)br
Identica: (@diraol) http://identi.ca/diraol
Twitter: @diraol

2011/5/10 Adriano Lima <humd...@gmail.com>

--
Você está recebendo esta mensagem porque se inscreveu no grupo "Transparência Hacker" dos Grupos do Google.
Para postar neste grupo, envie um e-mail para thac...@googlegroups.com.
Para cancelar a inscrição nesse grupo, envie um e-mail para thackday+u...@googlegroups.com.
Para obter mais opções, visite esse grupo em http://groups.google.com/group/thackday?hl=pt-BR.

[Transparencia AP]

O problema é que os artistas não ganham o seu dinheiro quando fazem
sua música.
Quem leva tudo é são as gravadoras. É o tal direito de cópia que é
vendido antes mesmo de o cara ter a inspiração.

Neste sentido, está certíssima a lei. O problema é que no Brasil o
pessoal ia conseguir dar a volta na lei.
O artista ia receber, mas só 0,001%. A lei não estipula o valor.

Mudando um pouco de assunto. O senador amapaense Randolfe "Harry
Potter" Rodrigues conseguiu o número mínimo de assinaturas pra abrir
uma CPI do ECAD.
http://www.alcinea.com/sem-categoria/cpi-do-ecad-agora-sai

Quem quiser ajudar, o twitter dele é @randolfeap

Abraço.

On May 10, 5:09 pm, Diego Rabatone <dir...@diraol.eng.br> wrote:
> Tem alguns comentários interessantes:
>
> "*Only if your a member of the Portugese society of artists. Don't become

> one and you can do anything.
> Usually by becoming a member of Ascap/Bmi/Sacem/... ...(author societies),
> you give up a lot of rights. Example : In France, when a becoming a member
> of the Sacem (local ASCAP), you give them the right to sell your music to TV
> channels without your consent (news broadcasts for ex., but not advertising
> or TV series). This became a big issue when DAFT PUNK refused to sign with
> SACEM because they wanted total control of the use their music. I think
> SACEM is still holding a lot of their money, i don't think they ever signed
> with the French author society.

> So it's a case of money or freedom :)*"