Chris,
Thank you--I appreciate your help.
David
> On Aug 25, 2016, at 5:47 PM, Christopher Stone <
listm...@suddenlink.net> wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 22:34, David Brostoff <
dav...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Both these solutions do exactly what I wanted. Is there any reason to prefer one or the other?
>
> Hey David,
>
> I suspect that the first pattern will be a little more efficient (without playing with backtracking), but I'm not certain.
>
> If Ronald Kimball is listening he might have an insight or two.
>
> The nice thing about the second pattern is that it doesn't touch the leading and trailing text anchors – only the comma you want to remove is touched.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Chris
>
>
> --
> This is the TextWrangler Talk public discussion group.
> If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem,
> please email "
sup...@barebones.com" instead of posting here.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TextWrangler Talk" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
textwrangler...@googlegroups.com.