Confirmatory tetrad analysis

[Kabiru Maitama Kura]

Hi 

Attached is the result of Confirmatory tetrad analysis in which I conducted using  SmartPLS 3.

Kindly, how do  I conclude whether the construct is formative or reflective based on the attached results?.

Thank you

Dr. Kabiru Maitama Kura

[cg...@andrew.cmu.edu]

Hello,

The excel file appears to be empty. I don'e know what you mean by "formative" versus
"reflective."

Cg

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Tetrad
> Users Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
> tetrad-users-gr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

[Arunkumar Balasubramaniam]

Hi
The confidence intervals of the following do not include zero. So, it is formative and not reflective as null hypothesis is rejected.
2: TI.LSa,TI.LSb,TI.LSd,TI.LSc

10: TI.LSa,TI.LSc,TI.LSd,TI.LSe

Please check "Gudergan SP, et al, Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling, J Bus Res (2008), doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012" for details.

Thanks & regards,
Arun