Re: Show implications

0 views
Skip to first unread message

aeagl...@gmail.com

unread,
Apr 14, 2009, 5:29:13 PM4/14/09
to misko....@gmail.com, testability-...@googlegroups.com
FYI


http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/17
File core/src/main/java/com/google/test/metric/Reason.java (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/17#newcode1
Line 1: package com.google.test.metric;
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> copyright comments

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/17#newcode20
Line 20: Reason(String description, boolean implicit) {
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> why not make this private ?

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/5
File
core/src/main/java/com/google/test/metric/method/op/turing/FieldAssignment.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/5#newcode34
Line 34: if (field != null) {
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> will field assignment have a null fieldinfo passed to it ?
> And of course, ewwww, work in the constructor :D

moved to caller

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/11
File
core/src/main/java/com/google/test/metric/method/op/turing/LocalAssignment.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/11#newcode30
Line 30: if (variable != null) {
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> mannnn, work in the constructor again ? :)

moved to caller

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/6
File
core/src/main/java/com/google/test/metric/report/issues/ClassIssues.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/6#newcode98
Line 98:
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> any chance for some javadocs on this one, since its not simply adding,
but doing
> something more ?

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/10
File core/src/main/java/com/google/test/metric/report/issues/Issue.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/10#newcode47
Line 47: public Issue(int lineNumber, String elementName, float
contributionToClassCost, IssueType type, IssueSubType subType) {
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> > 100. Do u care ? a bunch of them in this file

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/8
File
core/src/main/java/com/google/test/metric/report/issues/IssuesReporter.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/8#newcode53
Line 53: void addIssuesInMethod(ClassIssues classIssues, MethodCost
methodCost, ClassCost classCost) {
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> this method is getting pretty long.... Its pretty much unreadable

will fix in later CL...

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/22
File
core/src/main/resources/com/google/test/metric/report/costDetailBox.html
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/22#newcode34
Line 34: <#list issue.implications as implication>
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> where can i see an example of this ?


on my computer

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/13
File
core/src/test/java/com/google/test/metric/report/DrillDownReportTest.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/13#newcode197
Line 197: private void assertStringEquals(String expected, String
actual) {
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> why the heck is this funky indent ?

tabs - fixed

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/3
File
core/src/test/java/com/google/test/metric/report/issues/IssuesReporterTest.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069/diff/1/3#newcode172
Line 172: assertEquals(4/5f, issue0.getContributionToClassCost());
On 2009/04/03 23:58:02, Shyam wrote:
> is this that same test which evaluates to 4/5 instead of 4/6 ?

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/33069

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages