On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 09:48:20AM -0700, Rani Yaroshinski wrote:
> From the point of view of the performance measures of the OCR ?
I don't think anybody has figures on this. You could do some tests
yourself, and let us know the results.
I would guess that file size would be a bigger slowdown than the
sorts of compression that are available, so whatever is smallest
would be fastest, but that's just a hunch.
> If I can choose the format, which should I prefer ?
I always prefer PNG, only because it's simple and well-defined,
whereas there are lots and lots of different ways of constructing a
tiff image. That said I'm pretty sure you can get way smaller (but
still losslessly compressed) files with tiff using the correct
options, for grayscale / binarised scans.