Production of Free Energy Demands Throwing it Away

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Vinyasi

unread,
Apr 3, 2018, 11:34:22 PM4/3/18
to Tesla's Pierce-Arrow EV Experiment of 1931
Conventional Tesla coils' sole purpose is to throw away energy. This is what's missing in the Pierce-Arrow story. His project box produced, but did not dissipate, energy. The aerial on the back of the car was part of the disposal of excess energy. The AC motor disposed of a limited quantity of energy, but only when the car was moving. Energy had to be disposed of constantly, especially at start up, but also whenever the car came to a stop. Otherwise, the production would also stop and have to be started from a cold start all over again rather than be left idling which is the ideal.

Paul Falstad's electronic simulator uses the iron cores of his transformers to both produce magnetic overunity under certain conditions as well as consume it. This is paralleled by the use of the 4,000 lb. chassis of the Pierce-Arrow. But not directly, but indirectly. For a direct connection of Tesla's circuit, or the motor, to the car's chassis would be a high voltage hazard to anyone nearby. So, a secondary conventional Tesla coil is connected in parallel to the motor - if there is a motor, but a motor is not necessary for testing purposes. This dissipation scheme is necessary at all times for the circuit to function properly if at all. This secondary closed pathway coil is wrapped around the tubular open pathway primary coil whose one end is connected to the car's chassis and the other end is connected to the large aerial positioned on the rear hood of the car.

https://youtu.be/61N08M9Dnpk

In this video, I mistakenly mix up which is the primary and which is the secondary of a conventional Tesla coil. Oops...
https://cdn.instructables.com/FEW/8CPS/IXLAJM1F/FEW8CPSIXLAJM1F.LARGE.jpg
https://is.gd/jufefo

https://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-Make-a-Miniature-Tesla-Coil/
https://is.gd/pifuxu

Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter using a true Tesla coil for comparison to a conventional (ie, popularly misconceived version) ...
http://teslascientific.com/

A non-grounded predecessor ...
http://is.gd/mesmerizing

...to what was to immediately follow in sequential development showing the need for dissipation to boost overunity production ...
http://is.gd/lightning_oscillator

The central transformer/s are dissipating magnetic overunity into the transformer's iron core using it as a magnetic sinkhole of sorts...
http://is.gd/pierce_arrow
http://is.gd/pabattery
http://is.gd/rapidpa
http://is.gd/simplepa
http://is.gd/switchpa
http://is.gd/realpa
These latter six simulations may not produce overunity in the real world (not proven yet) to satisfy the Pierce-Arrow story, but all of them exhibit the necessity of throwing away excess magnetism all the time. This dissipation is more important than the selection of the motor to attach to this circuitry for the motor will throw away only a tiny portion of the energy produced and only discard energy intermittently - especially during stop and go traffic.

The following two circuits throw away all of their excess energy dividing up only a tiny fraction for thermodynamic wasting (conversion) of energy for the practical use of recharging batteries...
http://is.gd/batterycharger
http://is.gd/portablebatterycharger
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages