Vacuum capacitors

[262jp]

https://www.tedss.com/2020001361  possible vacuum capacitors for this circuit?

what voltage should 1:1 transformers be rated for?  could those be bought or need to be hand made?

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-C94sVR37FCA/Woass0hEgmI/AAAAAAAAF0c/2dormnVrKTEwlCjI5X78jQUaMDMOxAIWgCLcBGAs/s1600/LTSpice%2B1931%2BPierce-Arrow%2BSchematic.jpg

[Vinyasi]

Looks good. I wish I knew. I'm just an idea guy with no experience building HV circuitry. My expertise has been bionic circuits. So, this is all new to me. Go for it. And check out my latest response to myself, namely: to my first post and compare this simulation in Paul Falstad's simulator. I've included those files in the zipped file attached to that post.

[Vinyasi]

I'm sorry. I didn't answer your question. I don't know what voltage to expect these components to be able to tolerate. But I've noticed that everything outside the two LMD daisy chained horizontal tracks will be bombarded by a far greater voltage than anything inside those tracks. In other words, the AC motor coils and the two "throttle caps" (of greater than one Farad, each) immediately beneath the aerial input will suffer the greatest hardships of HV. Also, if you should choose to use a frequency generator generating a complex of multiple frequencies to replace an aerial input, then that too will suffer immense HV. In fact, it will suffer the most. At least with the aerial/s, there is the chance for ionization of the surrounding air to bleed off some of that HV to the nearest grounded objects and keep the FCC happy that we're not interfering with local radio broadcasts. This may be why Tesla took a spin out in the country side. Not just to rev it up, but to get away from city dwellers trying to get anything on their home radios without Tesla giving them a lot of static. {Ionization being a conversion of radio broadcast of EM signals and thus hopefully reduce the EM noise in the local area coming out of this device.}

[262jp]

That's ok, I think those vacuum capacitors will be about as good as any to start experimenting.  Very convinced that any reference to vacuum tubes was a mistake by whoever determined they were vacuum tubes and that they were indeed the vacuum capacitors that Tesla patented.  May need to wind custom transformers as I don't know of a use for a 1:1 transformer at High voltage to just buy them.  Just going to assume high voltage in the entire circuit until proven otherwise.  If you know of an off the shelf 1:1 transformer please let me know.

Also any suggestions of a motor to use for experimenting would be great if you have any.  I don't know of an ac motor with 2 alternate windings (2 phase?) but there are many many different ac motor designs most of them 3 phase.  Could start with a 10-20 hp readily available industrial/ag motor even if just trying to get power through the windings to test the circuit does anything useful on the bench.

[Vinyasi]

Looks like my simulation suggests a single phase AC motor?

... in which the two main windings are wired together in parallel and the two auxiliary windings are likewise to satisfy this simulation's windings?

Main vs auxiliary windings on a single phase AC motor design...
http://www.learnengineering.org/2013/08/single-phase-induction-motor.html

[262jp]

thank you! That makes much more sense.  Once I have a motor to play with can start building a circuit for it, those are easy to find.

[262jp]

Do you have a copy of your most successful simulated circuit to display with any of the values for resistors, inductance of transformers (technical details) listed?  

Trying to make a "shopping list". 

Took apart a small ac motor and the two sets of motor coils were different sizes, not saying all small ac motors are but this one had a small pair and a large pair of coils.  Maybe not a problem but might need to find the right motor or have one wound. 

Any reason this circuit couldn't be copied 3 times instead of two and use a 3 phase motor? 

Any large (80hp) motor is going to have 3 sets of coils instead of 2 sets unless re-wound.

[262jp]

please disregard, figured out that I can "run" the simulator at this link http://vinyasi.info/ne?startCircuit=pierce-arrow.txt as well as figure out what the component values are, like resistors etc.  Simulator went from Microvolts to Gigavolts in 6 seconds...this is going to get interesting!

[Vinyasi]

http://vinyasi.info/ne?startCircuit=pierce-arrow.txt

is not as good as...
http://vinyasi.info/ne?startCircuit=rapid-pa.txt

which I've updated to not be always dependent on the aerial, but merely for initial startup.

Have you seen this doozy?...
http://vinyasi.info/ne?startCircuit=radiant-energy.txt

The text should read...

Wait until you begin to get a charge on the inductor before switching OFF the battery. I'll have to change that text.

Where ever you see the chance for multiples of an item, go for it.

BTW, the impedance on the circuits you are pursuing are very high. The voltage divided by the amperage is going to give a lot of hot components.

But this doozy circuit is very low: under an ohm -- a tenth of an Ohm, I think. That's fairly cool, but will it run? It looks to good to be true, yet is very simple. I don't know.....

[Vinyasi]

Please see this video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-vfGG3i0SM

Due to my guessing that the circuit that you want to build...
http://is.gd/pierce_arrow

... will excessively heat up while the radiant energy circuit...
http://is.gd/radiant_energy

.... may not heat much if it succeeds at running at all.

[Vinyasi]

http://is.gd/3phasemotor
is even better than
http://is.gd/radiant_energy
The former exhibits ~34 mOhms impedance while the latter exhibits ~44 mOhms impedance.

http://is.gd/pierce_arrow

exhibits 840 kilo Ohms of impedance, while

http://is.gd/rapidpa

exhibits 5 Mega Ohms of impedance.

It's probably misleading for me to call the first circuit, 3 phase, when it's attempting to take advantage of off the shelf 3 phase motors without too much rewiring on the part of the builder while not being powered by three phase AC but by a single phase spatially repeated (and wired in parallel) over each one third portion of the motor's circumference. I'm hoping it'll do. But in all of this, I'm a newbie.

[262jp]

These circuits look much more promising than my Don Smith device experiments. 

[Vinyasi]

I want to draw your attention to the subtle difference in how this one circuit...
http://is.gd/3phasemotor

behaves in JavaScript, above, versus Java...
http://vinyasi.info/circuitjs1/vinyasi-cts/cold-electricity.cmf

in CircuitMod...
https://sourceforge.net/projects/circuitmod/

with Java installed on your PC...
http://java.com/

The difference is minute, but significant.

http://is.gd/3phasemotor
has 5 Farads on each of its two swapping capacitors and initiation of escalation of net power is begun using the left capacitor which implies a certain polarity of it being connected to the aerial and battery (since that is the only difference between these two capacitors).

While...
http://vinyasi.info/circuitjs1/vinyasi-cts/cold-electricity.cmf
has 20 Farads on each capacitor and escalation is begun with the right capacitor of opposite polarity. It won't escalate with the left one.

So, Java favors one way while JavaScript favors another. And the only reason, I think, that the Java version has its caps raised to 20 Farads is to reduce the rate at which it will lose its charge during its de-escalation phase. It's the polarity difference with its connection to the aerial and battery that is fascinating why it must have that reversal to begin with over JavaScript's version.

Maybe you already noticed this difference? I just wanted to make sure since CircuitMod does not run in browsers so there is the chance that you may not have noticed this. I want to make sure you have success since simulating does take some of the gamble out of circuit design, but it may not remove all of it.

The other factor is that both of these simulations use an aerial that delivers from 15 to 20 volts, AC. A normal sized aerial may only deliver from 5 to 10 milli volts (according to a simulator model available online for LTSpice) or 5 micro volts for a short piece of wire used for crystal radios a century ago. This may adversely effect how your build performs if your aerial fails to deliver a similar amount.

BTW, impedance is the same on both versions during de-escalation mode.

I hope this helps.

[262jp]

Very interesting, I noticed that there was a 20f cap on one circuit and 5f cap on the other but have only run them on the web browser simulator.  Trafo components (going to wind 8 just for this experiment), resistors, vacuum caps, all on order.  If an aerial doesn't provide a strong enough input might have to try using a function generator or some other type of oscillator circuit like an inverter.

[Vinyasi]

I chose to go with an aerial due to the huge voltage that will end up there. I wouldn't want your function generator to fry itself. But maybe a HV diode could protect it? The simulator wouldn't let me use a diode due to the need for allowing the current to reverse itself at the complex varying frequencies that result from the cap and coil enhancing their gain over time when in escalation mode.

Since simulations are idealizations of the real world (the real world of electrical behavior being a disappointment by comparison), this circuit may merely have one mode of operation involving only one 5F (or 20F) capacitor (but still inclusive of the small cap directly beneath the aerial; I went with 10 pF, but some other value may work as well; it must be very small yet withstand HVs). Or else, there may be some other consequence?

At the very least, any dual role this circuit may have may be whether a load is applied. In this case, it would be a mechanical load placed upon the inductor causing a secondary effect as if this inductor were a counter wound transformer (with swapped polarity)? Counter wound transformers behave differently in the various circuits I've simulated them in. Sometimes, they subtract from overunity gain. But sometimes, they enhance it. I haven't tried that situation, here, yet.

[Vinyasi]

After my last post, I became curious to discover what would happen with a load. Although the load exhibits its excessive resistance (and consequential heating), the DC motor coil does not....
http://is.gd/loadedradiant
http://is.gd/loadedradiantcmf

But I did realize that these latest simplified simulations are of a DC, not AC, motor action. So, I have to label this latest simulation as such. But applying it to an AC triple wound motor...
http://is.gd/3phasemotor

from previous posts may work just fine? If you think so, then I'll go with that. Sounds good.

I shifted the motor's connections to the left so as to prevent having its polarity swapped every time a toggling action occurs between the two right-most capacitors. Yet, spikes still occur in both positive and negative directions during each toggle action. Although I haven't bothered to redo '3phasemotor' to be likewise, I would imagine that it could benefit in a similar manner.

[262jp]

1.5 pf caps 10kv rated on order.  These schematics are great.  anxious to get these circuits on the bench and see if they respond at all similar to how they do on the simulator.

If getting an ac motor to run proves to be too complicated a fallback could be rectifying and powering a DC motor?  Also if voltage surge to infinity becomes an actual problem, a spark gap could possibly be placed somewhere as an effective safety feature to shunt/short or ground the excess.  Need to get a variety of ac motors here to experiment with.

[Vinyasi]

Sounds good. I'm also eager to hear of your results.

I made a mistake in my previous post and replaced the three attachments.

Adding a load of one Mega Ohm merely increased resistance on the motor coil by 700 micro Ohms from 45.3 mOhms without load to 46 mOhms with load. Since using a transformer of 0.5 coupling coefficience is not an accurate model for a motor, then I don't know what actual results would be. I've seen more complicated models for a motor online that, so far, I have refused to use. I'm trying to keep my simulations simple. Constant314, a contributor over at Wikipedia with a good deal of background in electrical engineering, suggested between 0.5 to 0.7 coupling coefficience for using a transformer to model a motor when I was attempting to model/develop a Joseph Newman motor. So, I used 0.7 for the Pierce-Arrow simulations and decided to rough it by using a lower value in this case. Didn't faze it.

[262jp]

I have a circuit set up on the bench not connected together yet.  None of the components match the values in the http://vinyasi.info/ne?startCircuit=radiant-energy.txt circuit but just using junk I have laying around in the workshop to see if anything interesting happens.  I took all the values of the components and entered them into the circuit simulator.  Did not get the runaway voltage effect the same as it does with the values as they are saved.  Trying to see if my 1mfd capacitor (instead of the 5F capacitor) was the reason it didn't "take off" on the simulator.  I tried entering 4.9F and then a different run at 5.1F (shouldn't be that critical of a difference)  and neither of them had the effect.

If you would like please try for yourself and see what happens. 

[262jp]

Changing the 12 vacuum caps on http://vinyasi.info/ne?startCircuit=pierce-arrow.txt simulator to 1.5pf still produced the runaway voltage effect which is good because that's what I ordered and they were expensive:)

[Vinyasi]

The values of the two capacitors on the right hand side of the circuit are not as important as is the one capacitor directly beneath the aerial. That one must be of ultra low value so as to reach saturation early on in its behavior and be forced to throw out most of the excess. This throwing out action is what induces its contribution to the circuit which is where the overunity occurs, because whatever it absorbs is not directly related to whatever it throws out. Each batch is separate from the another. What it throws out comes directly from the aether. What it absorbs comes directly from the circuit. They will not be equivalent. One will always be greater or lesser than the other by some magnitude of difference.

I think the right most caps create a need, while the left most is the supplier. So those right most caps need not be low level, and maybe should not be. This isn't a resonance phenomenon so much as an interaction with the aether. It's the low level cap which is grabbing energy from the aether and injecting it into the circuit using the aerial as a reference. And you'll notice that only one reference is required for a fully charged circuit to perform as expected. The battery was dispensed with at some point prior.This aether is what Eric Dollard calls counter-space since it is numerically represented by the complex number field.

I think what happens is that when it comes time to take the square root of numeric values, two simultaneous answers occur due to each answer is also composed of a unique waveform which gives it a unique identity from the other possible answer and unique from the parent waveform. This forces both solutions to manifest which is how energy gets created in the simulation. But this will happen only if the cap is low level, or is overwhelmed by the forces building up in the simulation, such as in my ...

http://is.gd/lightning_oscillator
{Although, in this simulation, you'll notice that there are two low level resistors adjacent to neons and the high valued caps in a specific sequence from left to right, so maybe that's how I got around not having any low level caps? Since capacitors have infinite resistance, then maybe this is why they are somehow related to resistors in some sort of loosely equivalent fashion?}

This may be why beat frequencies and phase shifted waves are crucial to the formation of unique identities to each newly formed wave. This could be considered to be what is normally called "noise". But if there is a semblance of unity that gets established among the various noisy waves so that they're not all out of harmony (of some sort) with each other, then maybe new energy might manifest?

Does this help? Or did you use a very low value for the left most cap and get nothing to happen?

[Vinyasi]

What about the two caps directly beneath the aerial input? Those must be high valued for that particular simulation to give runaway results.

Each situation is unique and rules of thumb are hard to come by.

This is why the trial and error approach, by way of extensive exhaustion - and I mean extensive (while I get to become exhausted!), works best. That's what use the simulator environment is ideal for.

Low level caps are highly unstable and it is this instability which favors their communion with the aether to act as a supplementary source to supply energy for the circuit.

So, maybe this pair of high valued caps beneath the aerial in the pierce arrow simulations create the need while the dozen low level caps are the supply? A turned around condition by comparison to the radiant energy simulation? I don't know. At this point, all I can do is guess.

We are told by Eric Dollard that in the early days of Tesla's AC motor and generator development, there was absolutely no engineering for that technology. Steinmetz had to invent that engineering in order for his employer, General Electric, be able to break (get around) the Tesla patents on AC generators and motors held by Westinghouse.

I think we're in the same situation, here. There is no engineering for free energy circuits until enough of us bumble and fumble around with it enough so that theoretical engineers can begin to acknowledge its existence and seriously study it instead of laughing it away.

[262jp]

I opened it up and ran it as saved, about the 60s mark it "took off"

re-opened it and changed the cap to 4.9F and it flopped.  never "took off", voltage got down to pV or less.

Didn't change anything but that value.  Still going to try it on the bench to see what happens.  Just trying to predict using the simulator to see how closely the results match up.

[Vinyasi]

Two possibilities...

1. The simulator likes whole numbers.
2. Free energy likes whole numbers and capacitor manufacturers and the International Electrical Engineers Association have conspired to never allow whole numeric value capacitors be made commercially available.

The former is a likely proposition.
The latter could be possible if we consider how easy it is to create beat frequencies rather than randomized noise using the harmonics of whole number series.
I tried putting a 4.9F adjacent to a 100mF and it didn't work. Which doesn't surprise me if the harmonic has to arise from out of a singular capacitance. Two adjacent caps may get out of sync.
Eric keeps relying on music as his analogy for the mechanics of the aether. So, the 2nd choice is a possibility.
And this may be why I have suspected that Tesla used variable capacitors to fine tune their harmonics. So, resonance does matter after all.
Prof. Arthur Mattuck did a whole lecture for MIT Open Course Ware on using differential equations to analyze pure resonance. When he drew an example of pure resonance and made motions with his hands to indicate that it will grow to infinite gain, then I knew there was vindication for what I have been studying does produce his graph. And so does MIT's sister site ...
http://mathlets.org/mathlets/poles-and-vibrations/

[Vinyasi]

Small whole numbers is what I should have said. Pythagorean pure (just) temperament scale has the best results if the ratios between two frequencies is a small numbered fraction such as 2/3 creating a perfect fifth or 2/1 creating an octave. Larger numbered fractions have the effect of dissonance upon the listener's ear rather than consonance resulting from the use of small numbers. So, 4.9 in proportion to 0.00000000001 will not be the same as would be 5:0.00000000001. The latter is a simple ratio of 500 billion to one. The former is a ratio of 490 billion to one - not a pure ratio. Or worse, if we consider margins of error and 4.9 is in error by 2% (5 / 0.1) if a beat frequency won't manifest with that much error? Or, it may manifest a beat frequency but not be strong enough in its growth rate to overshadow thermodynamic loss rate?

Consider a small group of musicians and one of them is using an instrument which is out of tune with the others. If this were a large orchestra, the audience may not notice (although the conductor may).

Considering the preponderance of thermodynamic losses in our collective thinking on this subject, resonance now appears to be very important. Because while the circuit is busy losing energy, it must surpass this loss orientation at a rate greater than the losses.

All of this is guesswork on my part since I don't really know. But you bring up and remind me of a complaint that someone had for my work in which he ran the simulator at different time frames and got varied results. Sometimes, the time frame can be altered a little and still get the same results as if a window of variation were allowed. Since the simulator is approximating and the frequencies of the simulation will impact these approximations based on the frequencies and the time step of the simulator, the foregoing is not surprising.

Maybe Tesla went with a more complicated arrangement more like the "Pierce-Arrow" circuit rather than this latest simple arrangement of "Radiant Energy" to avoid the difficulty of achieving resonance with only a few components? Maybe it takes a dozen vacuum tube variable capacitors to fine tune this thing?

The motor controller for the General Motors EV-1 ("Who Killed the Electric Car") built and sold between 1997 and 2003? was crafted into a finely tuned audio power system by a guy who gave this technology to Elon Musk of Tesla Motors and became a silent partner. That car was described by Tom Hanks as having a lot of acceleration.

Do they accept returns of merchandise? :(

[Vinyasi]

Looks to me that going with pierce arrow, or...
http://is.gd/rapidpa

...may bring you better more consistent results since it is so forgiving as you've discovered?

I also like the fact that I was able to modify those pierce arrow sims to not require the aerial to be used all the time, but only for a limited duration during start up (shortest for rapidpa). I'm concerned due to the experience of EV Gray's team of Richard Hackenberger after their first raid by the DA's office of Los Angeles, the FCC did a raid of their own and were more thorough: they took everything including a desk chair or something similar. And all due to Richard not using an AM radio in his work area to see if all of the HV was putting out local radio interference or not. It was. So, he devised a plan to placate the FCC and his neighbors who were complaining and avoid blowing up any more batteries (since they were using them as sinks for the excess voltage they didn't know what to do with) by flushing the interior of the motor with compressed air, line the inside surface of the aluminum motor housing with Teflon, and conductively isolate aluminum brackets (maybe also coated with insulation?) that were the supports for the rotor coils, and thus create two floating plates with a moving and replaceable dielectric of air to convert the EM disturbance into ions that would ground themselves out to nearby objects.

By comparison, this new series of simplified circuits (radiant energy, etc) are not only not forgiving for their component values, but the aerial has to be used all the time requiring some precautionary procedure similar to the EV Gray team.

Tesla didn't have to worry about the FCC, or did he? He took the car out for a spin in the country side to presumably "let her rip". But is that really the main reason?

This wouldn't be a problem if Tesla's vision that we all convert over to his way of doing things had taken global hold since there would then be no transverse electromagnetic devices to worry about them receiving radio interference from Tesla's longitudinal devices.

[262jp]

I was actually surprised there was a simulator so complex that it could perform this sort of task, had heard of ltspice in Don Smith forums but never used anything like this before. 

Noticed no difference in the pierce arrow circuit when changed to 1.5 so hopefully it performs in some way similar to the simulator.  Should be testing that one before long as well.  Most of the parts are in the mail!

[262jp]

For the is.gd/rapidpa circuit:

trying small capacitors https://www.ebay.com/itm/162445922634  and https://www.ebay.com/itm/282825980228

vacuum caps  https://www.tedss.com/2020001359

transformers https://www.amazon.com/2sets-transformer-ferrite-bobbin-material/dp/B01KT4JGB0/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1519617978&sr=8-5&keywords=ee65&dpID=412dUVxqPKL&preST=_SX342_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

wound with 20ga coated magnet wire (two coils 1:1)

 and resistors https://www.ebay.com/itm/10-NOS-Riedon-1-Ohm-UT-10-10W-Power-Wire-Resistors-1-Pct-Silicon-Coat-10-Watt/131103221504?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2057872.m2749.l2649

still need to figure out what motor to try.

[Vinyasi]

Cool.

[Vinyasi]

In this circuit,.....

http://is.gd/twolmdsflint

...it doesn't matter what the input is although the smaller the better to prevent FCC involvement.

What matters is a sparking waveform inputted in parallel with the LMD capacitors to continually surge them during surge mode. These would be low, extremely low, voltage sparks. It's their waveform which helps turn the LMD into an amplifier.

One source for sparks would be dragging a chain beneath the car. A rotary DC brush on a serrated commutator is another idea. And of course, its namesake, a piece of fire starter struck by metal.

[Vinyasi]

How many turns did you put on those transformers? Did you ever try to calculate their inductance? For...

http://is.gd/twolmdsflint

...anything above 11mH is good if my equivalent series resistance model is at all accurate. It puts resistance on coils, but at a fixed rate...

http://vinyasi.info/circuitjs1/!_zipped-files/#vinnies-theory

[Vinyasi]

Our mistake has been an oversight of not understanding Eric's LMD module. It's best to compare it with Tesla's Special Generator.

Thomas Commerford Martin  was there at the demonstration in 1894 and gives us a diagram showing massive 'M' coils which are probably the same coils described by William Lyne to have a very long strand of wire (fifty or 100 miles long was it?). That translates to a thin gauge emphasizing voltage and back EMF plus resistance similar to the way Joseph Newman thought.

The 'H' coils are like the LMD's capacitors.

The beauty of Tesla's Special Generator, or Tri-Metal since aluminum was the rod beneath the 'H' coils, is that its rate of reciprocation was constant.

Whenever Eric's LMD module/s increase their power during a surge, their frequency also increases.

This tells me that – not only did Tesla figure out Eric's LMD way back then, but – he also got it to not surge and, instead, put out a constant rate of whatever proportion of overunity he wanted to engineer. This eliminates any need for a drainage mode (which I have had to adapt myself to) since there's no gradual surge towards infinity, but an instantaneous surge (explosion) towards a fixed ratio of output over input which makes Tesla's Special Generator safe to operate and far simpler.

At any rate, the winding of an off the shelf transformer used for an LMD must be thin wire of many turns/windings. Back EMF is our friend. Transformer coil resistance is our friend. An LMD is not a motor coil intended to carry current. Instead, it's intended to build up voltage and lot's of it. When we drain it during drainage mode, then we'll get lots of current to appear on whatever motor is connected in parallel with the LMD. So, we switch from LMD thematic modality to TEM thematic modality when we follow the flow of current from the transformers to the motor in this style of circuit design.

I'm looking at rewinding the transformers you sent me (thanks) with very thin wire. Many of my latest simulations points towards a figure of milli Henrys as a minimum of inductance. At any rate, whatever minimum is required spells the difference between success or failure to get a surge to initiate and be stable in its growth rate. A lot will be determined by wire resistance. So, high resistance will also spell high inductance since more turns can fit onto any given transformer bobbin. This may seem obvious to many, but to me (who has had very little experience winding anything) I have to spell this out.

Back EMF is our friend since the LMD module uses it to amplify its voltage at the expense of its current.

Lewis Carrol's “Through the Looking Glass” keeps coming to mind since nothing is at it seems whenever dealing with surge oriented mentality.

What inspired me to write this little essay is the byproduct of having spent a few minutes looking up, online, motor charts and calculators for the relationship between horsepower, voltage and amperage. Then, it immediately came to mind that an LMD's coils are anything but a motor coil.

The motor coil is the load. It is not the secondary supply voltage which the LMD is. We're using the LMD as a subsitute for a bank of batteries.

Since high current is returned to whatever source initiates the LMD (due to the initiating voltage source becoming a load to drain into), I want to safeguard batteries from being abused by not using them if I can help it. I'd rather use an aerial to exhibit high current which can be toned down into the milli Watt range (at least that's what the simulator exhibits in my latest circuit)....

http://is.gd/twolmdsflint

I tried to reduce current appearing at the aerial way down to pico Watts by using a transformer of very low coupling coefficiency and a slight primary to secondary ratio leaning towards the circuit and away from the aerial, but this was at the expense of operating the LMD in an easy manner with latitude to lower the energy level should a surge overshoot my intended target. Dissolution of energy is also our friend should we make too much during a surge we'll want to backtrack and try again.

So, a quick click on the circuit, above, can reduce current to around an amp or so if the current has not escalated into the kilo amp range. It might still be possible to reduce it, but is a slight gamble.

Tesla's Special Generator is our only link with any known instance of a power supply being made out of an LMD. So, I use that as my ideal model of what works....

http://is.gd/lyneteslaspecgen
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/pentagonaliens/pentagonaliens08.htm#CHAPTER%20VIII:%20A%20TASTE%20OF%20OTHER%20ENERGY%20SECRETS

http://is.gd/lyneauthor
http://williamrlyne.com/author/william-r-lyne/

http://is.gd/specgenpgs
https://archive.org/details/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321

http://is.gd/pistonmotiongif
https://ia601509.us.archive.org/22/items/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/PistonMotionV2.gif

http://is.gd/zoomintopiston
https://ia801509.us.archive.org/22/items/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/BlowupOfPistonCenter.jpg

http://is.gd/pistonmotionmp4
new...
https://ia601509.us.archive.org/22/items/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/PhasesOfPistonMotionV3b.mp4

changed to replace old...
https://ia601509.us.archive.org/22/items/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/PhasesOfPistonMotionV2.mp4

http://is.gd/pistonmotionogv
https://ia801509.us.archive.org/22/items/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/PhasesOfPistonMotionV2.ogv

https://is.gd/discusspistonmotion
https://ia601509.us.archive.org/22/items/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/PhasesOfPistonMotionWithDialogueV2.ogv

http://is.gd/discusscomments
https://ia601509.us.archive.org/22/items/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/CommentsMadeOnYoutubePlusMyResponseV2.pdf

http://is.gd/describepistonmotion
https://archive.org/download/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/PhasesOfPistonMotionWithDialogue.flv

http://is.gd/phasesofpistonmotion
https://archive.org/download/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/PhasesOfPistonMotion.flv

http://is.gd/teslainvent
https://archive.org/details/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaBetterVersion

http://is.gd/origteslainvent
https://archive.org/details/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTesla

http://is.gd/originventoftesla
https://archive.org/details/InventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTesla

http://is.gd/closeupoftext
https://archive.org/stream/inventionsresea00teslgoog#page/n515/mode/1up

http://is.gd/missingdenom
https://archive.org/stream/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTesla#page/n504/mode/1up

https://is.gd/idealflight
https://archive.org/details/LyneOccultEtherPhysics_201609

https://is.gd/tubesforce
https://ia601509.us.archive.org/22/items/TheInventionsResearchesAndWritingsOfNikolaTeslaPages314to321/TubesOfForce.pdf

[Piero Canova]

Very instructive  , Thank you  Vin.

P.S: Russ Gries  of  open-souce-research.org  has  reproduced   the  'Newman effect'

[Vinyasi]

I agree. Russ is very knowledgeable and experienced and an able-bodied machinist.

[Piero Canova]

I  wonder  how  I  would simulate  a  Newman  effect..!?

[Vinyasi]

The extra energy is generated by the rotating bar magnet producing sinewaves (since it's a spinning magnetic field) predominating in current over voltage. These waves enter Newman's massive coil which is also receiving (from the batteries) a very large voltage oriented square wave. The blending of these two sources produces a mixed waveform capable of recharging his batteries. I used LTSpice to simulate this concept and posted them here...

https://josephnewman.info

Byron Brubaker informs me that those bar magnets -- which Joseph used -- can be improved upon by substituting magnetizable canisters of helium. As his example, he told me of a simple experiment in which you take a glass bulb evacuated of air and refilled with helium, then wrap a copper wire around the globe, and automatically, without doing anything else, a magnetic field will appear around that coil.

[Piero Canova]

Thanks for the link. But I dont see the file simulation?

[Vinyasi]

https://josephnewman.info/schematics

https://josephnewman.info/download

http://www.linear.com/designtools/software/#LTspice

[Piero Canova]

Thanks a lot Vin.
Many stuff  here!

You are right   on  the  aim   you   search  to attain,   I have  no doubt personally  on that.

But,   when  I  look at  all  the  sims,  I dont  see  any  apparatus  that   simulates  in  any way  the  behaviour  of  the  aether  from which   would  issue   the  reaction signal  to the stimuli ..

And  we know  that in a  aether  stimulli  , the  more important  is  the ration   ds/dt, in an infinitesimal  time relative  to the capacity limit of  the  calculator, which depends on the  machine running the code,

the  more accurate  it is.

I dont  want to get into the code..

Have  you any hint  about  this  argument ?

[Vinyasi]

Invoking the aether, or the term: "radiant energy", is indicative of a sociological disorder in which we have been collectively bound hand and foot to a digression from the full, and non-adulterated, truth which the conservatives who control the status quo of electronic engineering would rather not face within the domain of their own profession using the words of their trade along with concepts already endowed in Physics. No new word, or concept, need be invoked to explain overunity, or underunity -- in other words, the apparent creation or destruction of energy.

Physics already has Emmy Noether's Theorem in which time is taken to be an absolute reference frame for single observers so long as we adhere to the Conservation of Energy Law.

And it is the dielectric of a capacitor which holds the key to the apparent creation or destruction of electrical energy. Playing around with my parametric excitation circuit simulations (listed at the bottom of the "Vinyasi.Cts" menubar) convinced me of this.

Looking at the equations in Paul Falstad's simulator for the purposes of inserting equivalent series resistance into all caps and coils (using Wikipedia's article) ...

http://is.gd/eqseres

... plus standard wire resistance charts for various AWG sizes, and the early chapters of Joseph Newman's book: "The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman", it becomes very plain to see that the equations for determining current are a reciprocal relationship between caps and coils.

In other words, the mathematical calculation of current for an inductor is exactly the same as that used for calculating current immediately surrounding a capacitor. Their only difference is that each is the reciprocal of the other, namely: one over, or one divided by, the other.

And when equivalent series resistance is applied to a simulator's presumption of a super-conducting coil (especially in this case), a positive resistance appears which makes it more difficult to simulate overunity.

But when equivalent series resistance is applied to a simulator's presumption of a capacitor not possessing any ESR, a funny thing becomes obvious: ESR in a cap is negative resistance while ESR in a coil is positive resistance.

The magic of Eric Dollard's LMD analog computer -- of caps in series and coils in parallel -- is that we don't have to parametrically manipulate any component. All we have to do is make sure that it comes alive, or if it comes alive too readily, then intermittently suppress its surge to depress its explosive force (using switching and/or small batteries acting as anchor weights).

If surges were more common, Nature would explode too easily leaving nothing to remain for any duration necessary for creatures to slowly evolve.

So, surges are suppressed by Nature as well as by electrical engineering policies in their practice as well as in simulators.

But there are ways around this suppression which the LMD analog computer suggests may be possible (if a simulator lets us surge a circuit).

=========================================================================================

In Joseph Newman's case, I successfully simulated overunity and the recharging of his battery pack by assuming that a rotating magnetic field generates current. Nothing surprising, here.

Joseph only feeds voltage (for the most part) into his massive coil since resistance, via the coil's long wire length, is prohibiting any appreciable flow of current through it. So, where does the current arise from which recharges his batteries? It appears around his rotating permanent magnet.

And since Joseph inputs an initial mechanical energy to begin the rotation of his magnets, and since his coil accumulates voltage and retains it, his coil becomes a secondary voltage source more significant than his batteries since it also amplifies voltage input from the batteries by using a circuit which spends less voltage than the coil accumulates.

The sinewave current from the rotating permanent magnet blends with the commutator's square wave voltage to create an amplified wave of mixed shape (a blend between a nice curvy sinewave versus a square wave) sufficient to reverse current flow and impart a small charge to his batteries.

His device engages positive feedback in which the coil sustains anything offered to it allowing for accumulation of electrical energy since very little electrical energy is spent by the circuit as it converts its voltage into a mechanical advantage of tremendous torque.