Vinyasi
--------------------------------------------------------
Considered separately...
pierce-arrow.txt is equivalent to this link and will run at these locations...
http://vinyasi.info/ne
http://falstad.com/circuit/
http://lushprojects.com/circuitjs/circuitjs.html
And it will run at the following link if you have Java installed in your browser and import the file's contents...
http://www.falstad.com/circuit-java/
And is-this-realistic.txt is an idea that works in a similar manner to the above files.
As a side note, adding a small resistor near the antenna, in pierce-arrow-kaboom.txt, inverts resistance (negative resistance) and blows up when the switch is closed!
It might be better to rename our study of physics to its new name, called: the study of public policy?
My analysis is this...
Maybe the reason why Eric Dollard says that a bunch of capacitors and coils of wire are analogous to Tesla's use of his Magnifying Transmitter as a wireless transmitter is because capacitors are the electrical equivalent to the mathematical square root while coils are the electrical equivalence of the mathematical exponentiation? Thus, if energy in a circuit, or subcircuit, has no where to go but around and around and around in a bound circle (without ground), then why shouldn't we get infinite power gain over a period of time? In other words, escalation towards infinity either very fast or very slow? This escalation at any speed would be due to an initial energy value being inserted into the circuit equivalent to making an unknown variable equal to some finite value - let's presume some number other than one having a sign value of positive: 1.6. Then we take its square root which will result in two answers: positive and negative 1.2649. Now, we have two entities not just two possible answers taken one at a time, but both taken at the same time since both are true and we're dealing here with the simulation of a real world situation: massaging energy inside of a circuit.
So far, we've initiated a circuit by injecting some energy possibly a little voltage from the positive pole of a battery giving the circuit +1.6 volts. Then, we passed this energy through a capacitor which resulted in its dual square roots each of which were squared by passing these numeric values through an iron cored winding. But we make both the capacitor and the iron cored winding of a low value of capacitance and inductance to insure that they immediately reach saturation and kick out the excess which they can't absorb. This results in the reprocessing of some of whatever they receive through an endless cycle of repetition.
Using this system of energy management will always result in a multiplication of power beginning with the low level capacitor (let's say, having a value of 1 pico Farad) square rooting its inception of energy followed by the multiplication of each of those roots when this energy passes through the iron cored inductor.
The reason why each mathematical process treats inputs as unique is due to another phenomenon which has been taking place simultaneous with the above but which I have failed to mention: the creation of more variety of waveforms. These waveforms might be of a unique frequency, or geometry, or phase relation, or any other quality imaginable, or any combination. This gives a unique identity to each wave making it possible to clone waves and at the same time increase the overall power of the circuit by this simple Thevenin equivalence of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter described by Eric Dollard as his "analog computer" of a transmission network in which the capacitors are all in series and the inductors are all in parallel in this transmission network.
Vinyasi
run a simulation without being blocked by error messages stating
"Warning. Floating Node at...". This prevents us from building up a
voltage based on surge circuitry and is a direct violation of our
right to manifest what Eric Dollard describes as "uni-directional DC
impulse current".
http://is.gd/impulsedef
My solution was to not ground, directly, these nodes, but to indirectly
via a low level capacitor. This merely exacerbated the situation by
adding multiple points through which these impulses may come into space
from counter-space (traditionally called the ether) making it impossible
to manage these surges. If I can decompile LTSpice and remove this blockade
and recompile it, then we might have some hope. PowerUp and these Pierce-
Arrow circuits all exhibit overunity but without manageability. They surge
to infinity with no hope of keeping them within a useable window. This is
not realistic. This is contrived according to the public policy of
electrical engineering and the domain of politically controlled physics.
Vinyasi
---------------------
LTSpice is sooooo eradicate! Sometimes it gives "Floating Nodes" warnings and sometimes it doesn't. And sometimes it prevents us from running a simulation without doing something about it. Advice, online, is to ground out these nodes with either a grounding symbol, alone, or else with a low level resistor as well. I chose to put a low level capacitor in between these grounded nodes and the grounding symbol that LTSpice provides.
"Floating Node" can sometimes prevent us from building up a voltage based on surge circuitry and is a direct violation of our right to manifest what Eric Dollard describes as "uni-directional DC impulse current".
But my use of low level capacitors inline with these extra grounds exacerbated the situation by adding multiple points through which these impulses may come into space from counter-space (traditionally called the ether) making it impossible to manage these surges. If I can decompile LTSpice and remove this blockade and recompile it, then we might have some hope. Many of these Pierce-Arrow circuits exhibit overunity but without manageability. They surge to infinity with no hope of keeping them within a usable window. This is not realistic. This is contrived according to the public policy of electrical engineering and the eminent domain of politically controlled physics.
