The Clinical Diary Of Sándor Ferenczi Pdf

[Kanisha Dezarn]

worndust-jacket with small tears and tape repair on reverse, very good used copy, dark gray cloth. previous owner's name. FERENCZI, SNDOR. The clinical diary of Sndor Ferenczi. Edited by Judith Dupont ; translated by Michael Balint and Nicola Zarday Jackson. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988, 1st printing number line ending in 1, xxvii, 227pp., . 2023 available only in paperback from the publisher. - Translation of: Journal clinique (janvier-octobre 1932). The original manuscript was in German. - In the half-century since his death, the Hungarian analyst Sndor Ferenczi has amassed an influential following within the psychoanalytic community. During his lifetime Ferenczi, a respected associate and intimate of Freud, unleashed widely disputed ideas that influenced greatly the evolution of modern psychoanalytic technique and practice. In a sequence of short, condensed entries, Sndor Ferenczi s Diary records self-critical reflections on conventional theory as well as criticisms of Ferenczi s own experiments with technique and his obstinate struggle to divest himself and psychoanalysis of professional hypocrisy. From these pages emerges a hitherto unheard voice, speaking to his heirs with startling candor and forceful originality a voice that still resonates in the continuing debates over the nature of the relationship in psychoanalytic practice. 9780674135260 ISBN 0674135261. Seller Inventory # 95218

SHIPPING: will a second book fit in the same priority mail envelope (in US) or the international priority envelope at no extra cost for shipping? Please inquire or browse my stock.

PAYMENT: Customers in Germany may pay (in advance) by EUR transfer to my German bank account. Paypal, US check, postal order also accepted.

SAVINGS: Save up to %20 by receiving my occasional new arrivals E-mails. Inquire for details.

Throughout this paper, the theoretical and clinical approaches of D.W. Winnicott are reviewed in order to reread the written production of Sndor Ferenczi. Winnicott's clinical and theoretical concepts allow returning to Ferenczi and rescuing aspects of his work that had been silenced in the psychoanalytic community. Ferenczi, in turn, is one that holds his presence in Winnicott's thought. Even though there are few times in which he cites Ferenczi in his work, it is possible to draw clear relationships between both theories. Three main issues are addressed: the role of the environment as active; the primitive traumatic event in which there is no one that has experience of it, and psychoanalysis as the place to experience that which happened in the first months of life for the first time; and, finally, severe pathologies and psychoses: technical innovations in Winnicott and Ferenczi for the treatment of psychotic and borderline patients. It is concluded that the theoretical and technical developments of Winnicott serve to illuminate a retrospective reading of Ferenczi.

A travs de este trabajo, se retoman los planteamientos tericos y clnicos de D.W. Winnicott para releer la produccin escrita de Sndor Ferenczi. Los conceptos tericos y clnicos de Winnicott permiten volver a Ferenczi y rescatar aspectos de su obra que haban quedado silenciados en la comunidad psicoanaltica. Ferenczi, a su vez, conserva su presencia en limtrofe el pensamiento de Winnicott. Si bien son escasas las veces que cita a Ferenczi en su obra, es posible trazar claros puntos de encuentro entre ambas teoras. Se abordan tres puntos principales: el papel del medio como activo, la vivencia traumtica primitiva en la cual no hay un alguien que haga experiencia de ello y el psicoanlisis como el lugar para hacer experiencia por primera vez de eso que ocurri en los primeros meses de vida y, por ltimo, las enfermedades graves y la psicosis: innovaciones tcnicas en Winnicott y Ferenczi para el tratamiento de pacientes psicticos y borderline. Se concluye que los desarrollos tericos y tcnicos de Winnicott sirven para iluminar una lectura retrospectiva de Ferenczi.

It is difficult to accurately assess the effect Sndor Ferenczi's work had on the clinical and theoretical production of Donald W. Winnicott. From his writings, we know that he cited him on two occasions. These references indicate that Winnicott had access to Ferenczi's work and not only through Melanie Klein's use thereof. It is not known whether any formal meetings took place between the two psychoanalysts. Winnicott completed his training as an adult analyst in 1934, a year after the death of the first-generation Hungarian psychoanalyst, Sndor Ferenczi.

In his work Classification: is there a psychoanalytic contribution to psychiatric classification?, read at a scientific conference held by the British Psycho-Analytical Society on 18 March 1959,1 Winnicott states that "gradually and in the course of time the study of psychosis began to make more sense. Ferenczi (1931) contributed significantly by looking at a failed analysis of a patient with character disorder not simply as a failure of selection but as a deficiency of psycho-analytic technique. The idea implied here was that psycho-analysis could learn to adapt its technique to the character disorder or the borderline case without turning over into management, and indeed without losing the label psycho-analysis. Eventually Melanie Klein (1932, 1948) made her specific contributions showing that in the analysis of children psychotic disorders must be encountered, and that these could be dealt with if met by adequate technique, so that failure to deal with psychotic manifestations in childhood meant for her (as for Ferenczi) a failure of technique, not a failure of selection" (p. 151). It is interesting that he makes reference to Ferenczi's 19312 work in this citation (written in 1931 and presented in 1932 at the Wiesbaden Congress), as it was specifically "Confusion of Tongues between Adults and the Child" that marked the turning point in Freud and Ferenczi's relationship, which once again postulated the effective reality of trauma, a theme that Freud assumed was overcome based on the notion of "psychic reality" (for more on this matter, see Masson, Rachman, Sylwan, Hidas and Gutirrez-Pelez3-7). Moreover, it is worth noting the fact that Winnicott underlines the importance Ferenczi gives to the necessity of adapting the environment to the patient's needs. Ferenczi had worked on this a few years earlier, in 1927, in "The Adaptation of the Family to the Child".8 Winnicott's other and final reference to Ferenczi appeared one year earlier, in "Ernest Jones",9 which was published in the International Journal of Psychoanalysis.

Borgogno10 has highlighted several similarities between Ferenczi and Winnicott, referring to the relationship between their works and the psychoanalytic community. Ferenczi was subjected to direct censorship and it was not until 1949 that his work began to circulate, almost coinciding with that of Win-nicott. Although the British author did not undergo explicit censorship, Borgogno does note that Winnicott felt he had not been sufficiently recognised by his sphere. That said, when Ferenczi's works were published, which coincided in time with Winnicott's writings, a particular interest in the subject of countertransference can be found in both theoretical bodies. For both authors, the emotional response of the therapist is fundamental in the technique and analytical process. Borgogno also underlines the fact that both authors explain antisocial behaviour on the basis of childhood neglect.

The importance of the role the environment plays on mental health is more than evident in Winnicott's theoretical developments and he is undoubtedly the most noteworthy point of reference in this regard, with his concepts of active adaptation, the facilitating environment and the good-enough mother. With this in mind, his concepts resonate in various passages of Ferenczi's Clinical Diary1 such as, for example, in the following paragraph: "More proof that the lasting effect of the trauma stems from the absence of a kind, understanding, and enlightening environment [...] The childish personality, as yet barely consolidated, does not have the capacity to exist, so to speak, without being supported on all sides by the environment. Without this support the psychic and organic component mechanisms diverge, explode, as it were; as yet there is no ego-center strong enough to be worth mentioning, which could hold the whole of it together, also on its own. Children have no ego yet, but only an id; the id still reacts alloplastically, not motorically. The analysis should be able to provide for the patient the previously missing favorable milieu for building up the ego, and so put an end to that state of mimetism which like a conditioned reflex only drives the person toward repetition. A new couvade, so to speak, and a new taking flight" (p. 289).

In his essay "Fear of Breakdown",12 Winnicott reveals his theory that "clinical fear of breakdown is the fear of a breakdown that has already been experienced" (p. 115). The event remains rooted in a rather unique unconscious, of which he states "in this special context the unconscious means that the ego integration is not able to encompass something. The ego is too immature to gather all the phenomena into the area of personal omnipotence" (p. 115). Thus, the patient cannot recall something that is yet to occur, but must experience it for the first time in transference. Regarding this point, a link can be made with Ferenczi's line of thought, who also dealt extensively with trauma. With respect to treating his traumatised patients, Ferenczi highlighted the importance of connecting with the traumatic material, which initially is only accessible through repetition, given that it only exists as an "experience". However, it is possible to relive it through analysis and to make an "experience" of it, which results in the union of the patient's fragmented personality. Moreover, Ferenczi also notes that traumatic experience material leaves no record in any psychic instance. In this sense, one might assume that no record remains precisely because of the prematurity of the trauma (and the ego), as there is no established or differentiated ego to undergo the traumatic experience, but that this experience is only accessible by reliving the trauma under the favourable therapeutic conditions afforded by the psychoanalytic treatment and with an ego that is able to make an experience of it. In his diary, Ferenczi expresses this as follows: "The analyst is able, for the first time, to link emotions with the above primal event and thus endow that event with the feeling of a real experience" (p. 38) and, later, "... for the first time a conscious experiencing-to-the-end?" (p. 157).

3a8082e126