Ihave two countertop outlets in my kitchen that I am in the process of replacing with new, GFCI-protected outlets. These two outlets are on a circuit together, and they are the only loads on that circuit. After wiring the new outlets up and testing them, I noticed an odd behavior. When tripping the "upstream" outlet, the "downstream" outlet does not receive any power. I assume this is because they are wired in series.
GFCI receptacles have two sets of contacts, line, and load. The Line side of the receptacle is used to power the device, while the load side is used to power other devices down the line. Any device connected to the load side of a GFCI receptacle, will be protected by the GFCI receptacle.
There is no need to have a GFCI receptacle as the second receptacle, since it will already be protected by the first GFCI receptacle. Because of this, if the first device trips all devices on the load side will not be powered (as you have noticed).
But in a setup like this, you'll be required to have a GFCI receptacle at both outlets. The devices down stream are no longer protected by the first GFCI receptacle, because they are not fed by the load side of the device.
It is possible. You have to ask yourself if that's what you REALLY want; the design of a GFCI outlet is such that it will protect everything "downstream" of it and 99% of the time this is a very good thing.
Again, consider whether you REALLY want to not have GFCI protection on these outlets (and whether it's allowable by code). Sometimes it's a no-brainer; say your fridge is on your kitchen appliance branch circuit (perfectly acceptable). If the GFCI for countertop outlets trips while you're away from home, you don't want your fridge cutting out. So, you can often keep the fridge running by strategically placing unchained GFCIs in the circuit around the fridge outlet, bypassing protection for the fridge. Same for the microwave. BUT, most devices, such as your DW and disposer (those can be on the same branch as the countertop outlets IF the home was built or last reno'ed before 1996) require GFCI protection anyway along with all countertop outlets. Even the fridge should probably have GFCI protection if it has water/ice dispensers; it should just have its OWN GFCI, which trips when the fridge itself shorts and not the toaster next to it.
Code does not specifically require everything downstream of an installed GFCI outlet to be protected by that GFCI outlet, and so technically, bypassing protection is allowed. However, code does apply to individual outlets; any receptacle outlet within 6 feet of a sink, tub, toilet, shower or other "wet" area MUST be GFCI-protected either by having a GFCI outlet there, or having one upstream that has this outlet as part of its "load". So, if bypassing GFCI at any given point would make any downstream outlet non-compliant, you'll need to either suck it up and protect the whole line, or install a second GFCI further downstream to protect the needed outlet. As GFCIs start at about $11 and run up to $25 depending on a variety of factors (15/20A, TR/WR, EZ-wire, color, style, brand, region) putting multiple GFCIs on a circuit can become an expensive way to wire your home (though probably less expensive than rewiring the circuit completely).
If you really do want it this way, it's accomplished by connecting both line AND load wires to the "line" terminals on the GFCI outlet. You will not be able to use the "load" terminals to connect wires as those will cut out when the GFCI does. The best way to do this is to wire-nut the line and load wires together (hot separate from neutral of course) along with a third piece of insulated wire to connect to the GFCI terminal. The following will also work but licensed electricians may cringe; firmly screw both the line and load wires onto the line terminal (I see this all the time when working with daisy-chained switches in multi-gang boxes so it can't be THAT bad). This works perfectly fine if you use "EZ-Wire" GFCI outlets; they have a plate that clamps down with the screw to hold wires so you don't have to curl around the screw terminal. Most of these have holes or notches for two wires per terminal and they're very secure.
Typically, you would connect the line voltage to the Line pair, and you would run from the load pair to any downstream outlets and or lights. The load pair of terminals is already protected, so you need not use GFCIs further down the chain. So, if the GFCI outlet is the first item in the chain, everything downstream will also be turned off in a fault situation (As if the breaker tripped.)
What you need to do in your situation is to pigtail wires in the box before it connects to the GFCI, and to run a cable to the next outlet, which will now be unprotected unless you also use a GFCI outlet. (SEE TESTER101's answer with MSPAINT!!!) I believe the code says GFCI's are required within 6 feet from any sink. I go a bit further (9', with some common sense), to ensure that I can't touch the toaster with an 18 inch cord, with my 10" chef's knife while touching the sink. I also have stainless steel appliances which look like an attractive ground to me, so I treat them as if they were sinks.
In theory two in series should provide at least as much protection as having just on on the first receptacle in the string. But is there a chance that the two could somehow "synchronize/resonate" and end up not tripping or significantly delaying power shutoff?
Why do I have two GFCIs in a string and not just one on the first receptacle in the string? Because previous owner had already put a GFCI in the bathroom - which is somewhere midway in the string - and yesterday when I put GFCIs in the 1st receptacle of every string I saw no reason to bother reverting the bathroom GFCI to a regular receptacle.
BTW, I tested the protection at every receptacle by taking some current from the hot(black) wire and routing it through a 25W light bulb to the neutral(white) of another circuit to create an actual leakage. I noticed that for those receptacles that are after both GFCIs, both GFCIs tripped when I tested with the light bulb.
The Industrial Shock Block SB5000 series is a personnel protection device designed to meet the requirements for special- purpose GFCIs defined by UL 943C. This standard outlines GFCI classes specifically designed for use in industrial facilities. Class C GFCIs are intended to be used on three-phase systems where the line-to-line voltage is 480 V or less with a trip level of 20 mA, while Class D GFCIs are intended to be used on 600 V systems. The SB5000 includes DFT harmonic filtering, an automatic self-test feature, and is compliant to the UL 1998 Software in Programmable Components standard.
The SB5000 is available as a 208 or 240 V Class A GFCI, allowing commercial kitchens, vehicle service centers, and other non-dwelling applications to meet NEC 210.8(B) for their three-phase loads up to 100 A.
The SB5000 also monitors the equipment grounding connection between the Shock Block and load. This is a required feature for Class C and D GFCI devices and is recommended for Class A GFCI and EGFPD devices. If the ground-return path is broken, the SB5000 will trip and provide an alarm by changing the state of the alarm contacts. This monitoring circuit requires an extra (pilot) wire between the SB5000 and the load. At the load, the pilot wire is connected to a termination device. The other end of the termination device is connected to the equipment ground (typically the enclosure).
We use cookies to collect information about how you interact with our website and to remember you. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics about our visitors on this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy.
When you use our website, we collect personal data about you and your use of the Website, through cookies and analytics tools. We may also collect personal data such as your name, job title, company name, address, email address and telephone number either directly from you or by combining information we collect through other sources.
Because Littelfuse respects your right to privacy, you can choose to modify the cookies option and disallow some of them. Click on the different category headings to learn more and change default settings. However, blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer.
There are cookies which are needed for our website, applications or services to function properly. For example, these cookies remember your preference not to be tracked and identify trusted web traffic.
These cookies collect information about how visitors and users use our website, applications, and services. These cookies enable us to improve our website, for instance, by ensuring that users are finding the required information.
These cookies allow our website, applications and services to remember choices you make (such as your preferred language) and provide enhanced, more personal features. They may also be used to provide services you have asked for.
These cookies are used to deliver advertising that may be relevant to you and your interests. They are also used to limit the number of times you see an advertisement as well as help measure the effectiveness of an advertising campaign.
I have three outlets on the Kitchen island, wired in series. Two are on the counter, and one is underneath for the phone. I originally put a GFCI on the first outlet in the series, nearest to the sink; when I then tried to put the second outlet on the load portion of the GFCI it tripped it without fail; checked all the connections, still tripped it; I finally ended up giving up and wiring both to the Line terminal; so first outlet is protected, (luckily one near the sink) and the other two are not protected.
Keep in mind that, once the wires leave the "load" side of the GFCI, NEITHER wire can "cross-connect" with any other wire. Sometimes the downsteam neutral wires are cross-connected, and sometimes a shared neutral is used when two appliance circuits are drawn off of a double breaker.
3a8082e126