India was not the first place Sanskrit was recorded- it was Syria.

[Madhu Reddy]

Fact check: India wasn't the first place Sanskrit was recorded – it was Syria

Fact check: India wasn't the first place Sanskrit was recorded – it was... By Shoaib Daniyal As the Narendra Modi government celebrates Sanskrit, a look at the oldest known speakers of the language: the Mi...

[Giri Raj Thummala]

First we have to know that ancient Indian culture is far behind 1500 BC. It is related to beyond 5000 BC. The conspiracy done by Max muller mere translater who destroyed the very true nature of the indian culture by the sake of race culture. NASA also confirmed that.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "తెలుగు మాట" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to telugumaata...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to telug...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Kiran Talluri]

I accept with Sri Giri Raj garu's opinion in this regard. Moreover, the author should remember that the Vedic texts in Sanskrit language were transferred from generations to generations through vocal lessons and not in written form. As the article says, "The earliest form of Sanskrit is that used in the Rig Veda (called Old Indic or Rigvedic Sanskrit). Amazingly, Rigvedic Sanskrit was first recorded in inscriptions found not on the plains of India but in in what is now northern Syria." So one can understand that these inscriptions were made only after the Sanskrit scriptures were texted. And this period can be dated back to 1500BC.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "తెలుగు మాట" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to telugumaata+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.