Best Software For Rar Files
Violet Mcdow
Looking for good practices to reorganize file structure over a NAS. Some areas are a bit slower and these areas have excess bulk of files. Just trying to locate a good number to end at before we trial and error and confuse people with changes.
Most applications will do a scan of the folder when opening or saving so the more files the longer the delay so if possible try and minimise by categorising the files if possible even if just by date.
At my last job, we basically had a webapp that was a glorified Windows Explorer search window. Depending on the rights you were granted, you could perform searches and drill down and search for whatever file you needed. Saved alot of headaches and calls.
Number of files is tricky since everyone has their on method of organization. I have a big issue with file sizes when users cram a terabyte of music in a work folder somewhere by accident when they drag to itunes. SpaceMonger is a good little program to show size and folders on a drive. You can then see number of files and it breaks it down into folders.
I've hit a bit of a snag and could really use some help. I've got a bunch of photos in HEIC format, and I'm struggling to view heic files on Windows 10 (and potentially Windows 11) setup. It seems like my current setup just isn't cutting it for these types of files. I'm wondering if anyone has recommendations for a best HEIC viewer that's compatible with Windows 10 or 11? I'm looking for something straightforward and user-friendly since I'm not exactly a tech wizard. Any advice or suggestions would be super appreciated. Thanks in advance!
After a bit of research and trying out a few different applications, I found a couple of solutions that worked well for me. First, I discovered that Microsoft actually offers a HEIC file extension support in the Microsoft Store, which, once installed, it seems doesn't allow me to view HEIC files directly in the Windows Photos app, I don't why.
I also tried out a third-party app called TunesBro HEIC converter. It not only let me view HEIC files seamlessly but also offered the option to convert them to JPG if needed. This was super handy for sharing photos with friends who couldn't view HEIC files or for uploading to websites that only accept JPG.
Google Photos is a popular photo sharing and storage service developed by Google. It allows users to upload, share, and manage their photos and videos from any device. It supports a wide range of photo and video formats, including the High Efficiency Image File Format (HEIC). HEIC is a format used by Apple's iOS devices for storing high-quality images in smaller file sizes compared to traditional formats like JPEG. However, HEIC is not as widely supported on non-Apple platforms, which can create challenges when sharing or viewing these files.
Once uploaded, Google Photos automatically converts HEIC files to a compatible format for easy viewing across all devices. Simply click or tap on an image to view it. You can also use Google Photos' editing tools to enhance your images.
Encouraged by that success, I also decided to give TunesBro HEIC Converter a shot, especially since I often need to convert photos for sharing with friends and family or for use on websites. The ability to easily convert HEIC files to JPG has been a game changer for me. It's incredibly user-friendly and the batch conversion feature has saved me so much time.
@DemoCr785 I have installed the hevc and heic additions as Microsoft suggests. However, the photos created by modern cameras and phones support wider dynamic range than 8 bits, and these image are not supported yet bu this plugin it seems.
I have nearly 4TB of assorted files on a drive to upload to a SharePoint Online site. What's the best/fastest way to upload all these files? (Hopefully, it doesn't involve a paid third-party product. ) Thanks!
Well, of course you will need a plan. Im not saying uploading ALL files at once would be the best approach. Its possible to use PowerShell (PnP for example), but the same issue will persist with this size... Do you have any suggestions?
The problem is the use of local temp storage by the SPMT. I have the smallest folder that contains 60GB of data and the available free space on the system is 50GB. So the process runs out of temp space and gets an error. Any suggestions??
This Listing Shows What Formats are Supported in the Latest Build of TransMagic (R14.00.000 as of this writing) CAD Format Types This CAD formats listing is broken into four areas; native formats, geometric modeling kernel formats, neutral formats,...
Since you and I are not experts in Solid works I was hoping someone who has done the interchange between the two - who I tagged @napperkt might shed more light and detail out what they suggested and how it works out (in terms of steps) as I tried it and failed.
Whats the best or no loss ways to export/ convert Sketchup Files to Solid Works and/ or other CAD formats?..Solid Works (sending rough ideas of mine to someone for proper designing), Fusion 360, * Free CAD / Libre CAD
The people who continued the work in Solidworks had to make the whole design from scratch - only using the imported SketchUp-stl model as a reference. Under the hood these programs like Solidworks are totally different and use a much much higher precision for curved shapes etc (parametrics).
Same situation for me. We have a great time creating models in SketchUp, but the Sheet Metal guys use SolidWorks and have so far rejected both our dxf file and out STL file as inadequate.
I can send them the DGW I suppose, but I wonder why that would work and not dxf/stl.
I want to transfer files (a music folder) between two Linux computers. After searching for the best way to do this, I've seen that there are lots of ways of doing this. I know this has been asked a lot, everywhere and all the time. The main problem with this is that there is no clear, recent consensus on one best way to do this task in 2011 for Linux beginners (even depending on some parameters).
So in the spirit of the Stack Exchange websites, I want this not to be related to my particular situation, but more of a guide to others as well on how to transfer files between two Linux computers over a local network. I think a wiki would be useful for many.
What is the easiest? Most flexible? Simplest? Best solution? What are the pros and cons of each? Are there other (better) options? What are the parameters in choosing the best method (solution might depend on number of files, filesize, easiness vs. flexibility, ...)?
SFTP is a tool that makes it easy to do a lot of operations on a remote file system - it works just like FTP, but it runs through SSH so it's secure and requires only an SSH server. man sftp will tell you all about how to use it. I don't use SFTP just to move a folder between two machines, it's more useful when you have a lot of operations to do, like if you're rearranging files on another computer.
SSHFS just extends SFTP in to a file system: it allows you to mount a virtual host in to your file system, so the network stuff happens totally transparently. SSHFS is for semi-permanent setups, not just a one-time file transfer. It takes some more effort to get set up, which you can read about on the project website.
What's actually happening here is that the 'receiving' computer is connecting to the sending computer on port 45454 and receiving the tar'd and gzip'd contents of the directory, and is passing that directly to tar (and gzip) to extract it into the current directory.
I would recommend you trying alternatives instead going straight with SSH for moving files inside your own LAN as the overhead is IMMENSE.I would go with Caspar's solution if this one for whatever reason won't work for you:
If it absolutely has to be done over the LAN, I'd use rsync, as it will pick up where it left off if it gets interrupted. It also has a few other tricks for minimizing the amount of data that gets transferred, although I doubt that many/any of them would be relevant to the case of copying a music library to a virgin location. If security is a concern, just set RSYNC_RSH=ssh first and the data will be tunneled over ssh.
If I were actually doing it, though, I probably wouldn't use the LAN at all. I'd copy the files onto, then off of, a USB hard drive. In my experience, this can easily be multiple orders of magnitude faster than going over the LAN, despite having to copy the files twice - USB 2.0 is rated for 480Mbps, which is faster than anything short of gigabit ethernet, plus it's less sensitive to conditions which will degrade the performance of a LAN. It's also completely OS-independent, provided you use a file system that all involved machines can handle - I'd recommend VFAT/FAT32, since that's pretty much universal.
I use Unison, which is an awesome file synchronizer over many different protocols. You can configure it to use scp, rcp, ftp or even locally on the filesystem between two folders. I use it to synchronize my music library, as it can transfer multiple files at once over the network and is really tuneable in its configuration. I keep my music collection backed up and in sync over 2-3 computers. It will only copy changed files, and does so by keeping an index on both ends of the transfer so as to be able to tell when a client has changed the file or when the server file has changed.
I would suggest rsync as it will copy files incrementally. You can set it up to copy either only modified or new files only once you have done the initial update. You can use ssh as a transport layer if you wish.
93ddb68554